Marvin Kaster

Fabian Czappa, Marvin Kaster, Felix Wolf

The detailed functioning of the human brain remains incompletely understood. Large-scale brain simulations complement experimental research but face substantial computational challenges: the human brain comprises approximately $10^{11}$ neurons connected by $10^{14}$ synapses, collectively forming the connectome. Empirical evidence indicates that modifications of the connectome -- specifically the formation and elimination of synapses, referred to as structural plasticity -- are essential for processes such as learning and memory formation. Connectivity updates can be computed efficiently using a Barnes--Hut-inspired approximation that reduces computational complexity from $O(n^2)$ to $O(n \log n)$, where $n$ denotes the number of neurons. Despite this improvement, communication overhead still limits scalability. Synapse updates rely heavily on remote memory access (RMA), and spike transmission requires all-to-all communication at every simulation time step. We introduce a novel algorithm that reduces communication by migrating computation rather than data. This approach reduces connectivity update time by a factor of 6 and spike transmission time by more than 2 orders of magnitude.

Marvin Kaster, Wei Zhao, Steffen Eger

Evaluation metrics are a key ingredient for progress of text generation systems. In recent years, several BERT-based evaluation metrics have been proposed (including BERTScore, MoverScore, BLEURT, etc.) which correlate much better with human assessment of text generation quality than BLEU or ROUGE, invented two decades ago. However, little is known what these metrics, which are based on black-box language model representations, actually capture (it is typically assumed they model semantic similarity). In this work, we use a simple regression based global explainability technique to disentangle metric scores along linguistic factors, including semantics, syntax, morphology, and lexical overlap. We show that the different metrics capture all aspects to some degree, but that they are all substantially sensitive to lexical overlap, just like BLEU and ROUGE. This exposes limitations of these novelly proposed metrics, which we also highlight in an adversarial test scenario.