Edgar A. Aguilar

Anand Balakrishnan, Stefan Jakšić, Edgar A. Aguilar et al.

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a popular approach for robotic path planning in uncertain environments. However, the control policies trained for an RL agent crucially depend on user-defined, state-based reward functions. Poorly designed rewards can lead to policies that do get maximal rewards but fail to satisfy desired task objectives or are unsafe. There are several examples of the use of formal languages such as temporal logics and automata to specify high-level task specifications for robots (in lieu of Markovian rewards). Recent efforts have focused on inferring state-based rewards from formal specifications; here, the goal is to provide (probabilistic) guarantees that the policy learned using RL (with the inferred rewards) satisfies the high-level formal specification. A key drawback of several of these techniques is that the rewards that they infer are sparse: the agent receives positive rewards only upon completion of the task and no rewards otherwise. This naturally leads to poor convergence properties and high variance during RL. In this work, we propose using formal specifications in the form of symbolic automata: these serve as a generalization of both bounded-time temporal logic-based specifications as well as automata. Furthermore, our use of symbolic automata allows us to define non-sparse potential-based rewards which empirically shape the reward surface, leading to better convergence during RL. We also show that our potential-based rewarding strategy still allows us to obtain the policy that maximizes the satisfaction of the given specification.

Luigi Berducci, Edgar A. Aguilar, Dejan Ničković et al.

The automatic synthesis of policies for robotic-control tasks through reinforcement learning relies on a reward signal that simultaneously captures many possibly conflicting requirements. In this paper, we in\-tro\-duce a novel, hierarchical, potential-based reward-shaping approach (HPRS) for defining effective, multivariate rewards for a large family of such control tasks. We formalize a task as a partially-ordered set of safety, target, and comfort requirements, and define an automated methodology to enforce a natural order among requirements and shape the associated reward. Building upon potential-based reward shaping, we show that HPRS preserves policy optimality. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates HPRS's superior ability in capturing the intended behavior, resulting in task-satisfying policies with improved comfort, and converging to optimal behavior faster than other state-of-the-art approaches. We demonstrate the practical usability of HPRS on several robotics applications and the smooth sim2real transition on two autonomous-driving scenarios for F1TENTH race cars.