LGSep 8, 2024
ICML Topological Deep Learning Challenge 2024: Beyond the Graph DomainGuillermo Bernárdez, Lev Telyatnikov, Marco Montagna et al.
This paper describes the 2nd edition of the ICML Topological Deep Learning Challenge that was hosted within the ICML 2024 ELLIS Workshop on Geometry-grounded Representation Learning and Generative Modeling (GRaM). The challenge focused on the problem of representing data in different discrete topological domains in order to bridge the gap between Topological Deep Learning (TDL) and other types of structured datasets (e.g. point clouds, graphs). Specifically, participants were asked to design and implement topological liftings, i.e. mappings between different data structures and topological domains --like hypergraphs, or simplicial/cell/combinatorial complexes. The challenge received 52 submissions satisfying all the requirements. This paper introduces the main scope of the challenge, and summarizes the main results and findings.
LGNov 4, 2025
Homomorphism distortion: A metric to distinguish them all and in the latent space bind themMartin Carrasco, Olga Zaghen, Erik Bekkers et al.
For far too long, expressivity of graph neural networks has been measured \emph{only} in terms of combinatorial properties. In this work we stray away from this tradition and provide a principled way to measure similarity between vertex attributed graphs. We denote this measure as the \emph{graph homomorphism distortion}. We show it can \emph{completely characterize} graphs and thus is also a \emph{complete graph embedding}. However, somewhere along the road, we run into the graph canonization problem. To circumvent this obstacle, we devise to efficiently compute this measure via sampling, which in expectation ensures \emph{completeness}. Additionally, we also discovered that we can obtain a metric from this measure. We validate our claims empirically and find that the \emph{graph homomorphism distortion}: (1.) fully distinguishes the \texttt{BREC} dataset with up to $4$-WL non-distinguishable graphs, and (2.) \emph{outperforms} previous methods inspired in homomorphisms under the \texttt{ZINC-12k} dataset. These theoretical results, (and their empirical validation), pave the way for future characterization of graphs, extending the graph theoretic tradition to new frontiers.
LGJun 9, 2024Code
TopoBench: A Framework for Benchmarking Topological Deep LearningLev Telyatnikov, Guillermo Bernardez, Marco Montagna et al.
This work introduces TopoBench, an open-source library designed to standardize benchmarking and accelerate research in topological deep learning (TDL). TopoBench decomposes TDL into a sequence of independent modules for data generation, loading, transforming and processing, as well as model training, optimization and evaluation. This modular organization provides flexibility for modifications and facilitates the adaptation and optimization of various TDL pipelines. A key feature of TopoBench is its support for transformations and lifting across topological domains. Mapping the topology and features of a graph to higher-order topological domains, such as simplicial and cell complexes, enables richer data representations and more fine-grained analyses. The applicability of TopoBench is demonstrated by benchmarking several TDL architectures across diverse tasks and datasets.
LGMay 7
No Triangulation Without Representation: Generalization in Topological Deep LearningJohannes S. Schmidt, Martin Carrasco, Ernst Röell et al.
Despite an ever-increasing interest in topological deep learning models that target higher-order datasets, there is no consensus on how to evaluate such models. This is exacerbated by the fact that topological objects permit operations, such as structural refinements, that are not appropriate for graph data. In this work, we extend MANTRA, a benchmark dataset containing manifold triangulations, to a larger class of manifolds with more diverse homeomorphism types. We show that, unlike prior claims, both graph neural networks (GNNs) and higher-order message passing (HOMP) methods can saturate the benchmark. However, we find that this is contingent on the right representation and feature assignment, emphasizing their importance in baseline models. We thus provide a novel evaluation protocol based on representational diversity and triangulation refinement. Surprisingly, we find no indication that existing models are capable of generalizing beyond the combinatorial structure of the data. This points towards a research gap in developing models that understand topological structure independent of scale. Our work thus provides the necessary scaffolding to evaluate future models and enable the development of topology-aware inductive biases.
LGMay 7
Diversity Curves for Graph Representation LearningKatharina Limbeck, Nadja Häusermann, Martin Carrasco et al.
Graph-level representations are crucial tools for characterising structural differences between graphs. However, comparing graphs with different cardinalities, even when sampled from the same underlying distribution, remains challenging. Unsupervised tasks in particular require interpretable, scalable, and reliable size-aware graph representations. Our work addresses these issues by tracking the structural diversity of a graph across coarsening levels. The resulting graph embeddings, which we denote diversity curves, are interpretable by construction, efficient, and directly comparable across coarsening hierarchies. Specifically, we track the spread of graphs, a novel isometry invariant that is inherently well-suited for encoding the metric diversity and geometry of graphs. We utilise edge contraction coarsening and prove that this improves expressivity, thus leading to more powerful graph-level representations than structural descriptors alone. Demonstrating their utility over a range of baseline methods in practice, we use diversity curves to (i) cluster and visualise simulated graphs across varying sizes, (ii) distinguish the geometry of single-cell graphs, (iii) compare the structure of molecular graph datasets, and (iv) characterise geometric shapes.
LGMay 21, 2025
HOPSE: Scalable Higher-Order Positional and Structural Encoder for Combinatorial RepresentationsMartin Carrasco, Guillermo Bernardez, Marco Montagna et al.
While Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have proven highly effective at modeling relational data, pairwise connections cannot fully capture multi-way relationships naturally present in complex real-world systems. In response to this, Topological Deep Learning (TDL) leverages more general combinatorial representations -- such as simplicial or cellular complexes -- to accommodate higher-order interactions. Existing TDL methods often extend GNNs through Higher-Order Message Passing (HOMP), but face critical \emph{scalability challenges} due to \textit{(i)} a combinatorial explosion of message-passing routes, and \textit{(ii)} significant complexity overhead from the propagation mechanism. This work presents HOPSE (Higher-Order Positional and Structural Encoder), an alternative method to solve tasks involving higher-order interactions \emph{without message passing}. Instead, HOPSE breaks \emph{arbitrary higher-order domains} into their neighborhood relationships using a Hasse graph decomposition. This method shows that decoupling the representation learning of neighborhood topology from that of attributes results in lower computational complexity, casting doubt on the need for HOMP. The experiments on molecular graph tasks and topological benchmarks show that HOPSE matches performance on traditional TDL datasets and outperforms HOMP methods on topological tasks, achieving up to $7\times$ speedups over HOMP-based models, opening a new path for scalable TDL.
LGOct 11, 2025
Rademacher Meets Colors: More Expressivity, but at What Cost ?Martin Carrasco, Caio F. Deberaldini Netto, Vahan A. Martirosyan et al.
The expressive power of graph neural networks (GNNs) is typically understood through their correspondence with graph isomorphism tests such as the Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) hierarchy. While more expressive GNNs can distinguish a richer set of graphs, they are also observed to suffer from higher generalization error. This work provides a theoretical explanation for this trade-off by linking expressivity and generalization through the lens of coloring algorithms. Specifically, we show that the number of equivalence classes induced by WL colorings directly bounds the GNNs Rademacher complexity -- a key data-dependent measure of generalization. Our analysis reveals that greater expressivity leads to higher complexity and thus weaker generalization guarantees. Furthermore, we prove that the Rademacher complexity is stable under perturbations in the color counts across different samples, ensuring robustness to sampling variability across datasets. Importantly, our framework is not restricted to message-passing GNNs or 1-WL, but extends to arbitrary GNN architectures and expressivity measures that partition graphs into equivalence classes. These results unify the study of expressivity and generalization in GNNs, providing a principled understanding of why increasing expressive power often comes at the cost of generalization.