Yao Ji

LG
h-index2
3papers
10citations
Novelty70%
AI Score43

3 Papers

83.0OCApr 7
Stochastic Auto-conditioned Fast Gradient Methods with Optimal Rates

Yao Ji, Guanghui Lan

Achieving optimal rates for stochastic composite convex optimization without prior knowledge of problem parameters remains a central challenge. In the deterministic setting, the auto-conditioned fast gradient method has recently been proposed to attain optimal accelerated rates without line-search procedures or prior knowledge of the Lipschitz smoothness constant, providing a natural prototype for parameter-free acceleration. However, extending this approach to the stochastic setting has proven technically challenging and remains open. Existing parameter-free stochastic methods either fail to achieve accelerated rates or rely on restrictive assumptions, such as bounded domains, bounded gradients, prior knowledge of the iteration horizon, or strictly sub-Gaussian noise. To address these limitations, we propose a stochastic variant of the auto-conditioned fast gradient method, referred to as stochastic AC-FGM. The proposed method is fully adaptive to the Lipschitz constant, the iteration horizon, and the noise level, enabling both adaptive stepsize selection and adaptive mini-batch sizing without line-search procedures. Under standard bounded conditional variance assumptions, we show that stochastic AC-FGM achieves the optimal iteration complexity of $O(1/\sqrt{\varepsilon})$ and the optimal sample complexity of $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$.

LGMay 30, 2025
From Invariant Representations to Invariant Data: Provable Robustness to Spurious Correlations via Noisy Counterfactual Matching

Ruqi Bai, Yao Ji, Zeyu Zhou et al.

Models that learn spurious correlations from training data often fail when deployed in new environments. While many methods aim to learn invariant representations to address this, they often underperform standard empirical risk minimization (ERM). We propose a data-centric alternative that shifts the focus from learning invariant representations to leveraging invariant data pairs -- pairs of samples that should have the same prediction. We prove that certain counterfactuals naturally satisfy this invariance property. Based on this, we introduce Noisy Counterfactual Matching (NCM), a simple constraint-based method that improves robustness by leveraging even a small number of \emph{noisy} counterfactual pairs -- improving upon prior works that do not explicitly consider noise. For linear causal models, we prove that NCM's test-domain error is bounded by its in-domain error plus a term dependent on the counterfactuals' quality and diversity. Experiments on synthetic data validate our theory, and we demonstrate NCM's effectiveness on real-world datasets.

LGNov 12, 2021
Distributed Sparse Regression via Penalization

Yao Ji, Gesualdo Scutari, Ying Sun et al.

We study sparse linear regression over a network of agents, modeled as an undirected graph (with no centralized node). The estimation problem is formulated as the minimization of the sum of the local LASSO loss functions plus a quadratic penalty of the consensus constraint -- the latter being instrumental to obtain distributed solution methods. While penalty-based consensus methods have been extensively studied in the optimization literature, their statistical and computational guarantees in the high dimensional setting remain unclear. This work provides an answer to this open problem. Our contribution is two-fold. First, we establish statistical consistency of the estimator: under a suitable choice of the penalty parameter, the optimal solution of the penalized problem achieves near optimal minimax rate $\mathcal{O}(s \log d/N)$ in $\ell_2$-loss, where $s$ is the sparsity value, $d$ is the ambient dimension, and $N$ is the total sample size in the network -- this matches centralized sample rates. Second, we show that the proximal-gradient algorithm applied to the penalized problem, which naturally leads to distributed implementations, converges linearly up to a tolerance of the order of the centralized statistical error -- the rate scales as $\mathcal{O}(d)$, revealing an unavoidable speed-accuracy dilemma.Numerical results demonstrate the tightness of the derived sample rate and convergence rate scalings.