Karma Phuntsho

Karma Phuntsho, Abdullah, Kyungmi Lee et al.

Foundation models (FMs) have emerged as a transformative paradigm in medical image analysis, offering the potential to provide generalizable, task-agnostic solutions across a wide range of clinical tasks and imaging modalities. Their capacity to learn transferable representations from large-scale data has the potential to address the limitations of conventional task-specific models. However, adaptation of FMs to real-world clinical practice remains constrained by key challenges, including domain shifts, limited availability of high-quality annotated data, substantial computational demands, and strict privacy requirements. This review presents a comprehensive assessment of strategies for adapting FMs to the specific demands of medical imaging. We examine approaches such as supervised fine-tuning, domain-specific pretraining, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, self-supervised learning, hybrid methods, and multimodal or cross-modal frameworks. For each, we evaluate reported performance gains, clinical applicability, and limitations, while identifying trade-offs and unresolved challenges that prior reviews have often overlooked. Beyond these established techniques, we also highlight emerging directions aimed at addressing current gaps. These include continual learning to enable dynamic deployment, federated and privacy-preserving approaches to safeguard sensitive data, hybrid self-supervised learning to enhance data efficiency, data-centric pipelines that combine synthetic generation with human-in-the-loop validation, and systematic benchmarking to assess robust generalization under real-world clinical variability. By outlining these strategies and associated research gaps, this review provides a roadmap for developing adaptive, trustworthy, and clinically integrated FMs capable of meeting the demands of real-world medical imaging.

Karma Phuntsho, Abdullah, Kyungmi Lee et al.

Foundation models (FMs) have demonstrated strong transferability across medical imaging tasks, yet their clinical utility depends critically on how pretrained representations are adapted to domain-specific data, supervision regimes, and deployment constraints. Prior surveys primarily emphasize architectural advances and application coverage, while the mechanisms of adaptation and their implications for robustness, calibration, and regulatory feasibility remain insufficiently structured. This review introduces a strategy-centric framework for FM adaptation in medical image analysis (MIA). We conceptualize adaptation as a post-pretraining intervention and organize existing approaches into five mechanisms: parameter-, representation-, objective-, data-centric, and architectural/sequence-level adaptation. For each mechanism, we analyze trade-offs in adaptation depth, label efficiency, domain robustness, computational cost, auditability, and regulatory burden. We synthesize evidence across classification, segmentation, and detection tasks, highlighting how adaptation strategies influence clinically relevant failure modes rather than only aggregate benchmark performance. Finally, we examine how adaptation choices interact with validation protocols, calibration stability, multi-institutional deployment, and regulatory oversight. By reframing adaptation as a process of controlled representational change under clinical constraints, this review provides practical guidance for designing FM-based systems that are robust, auditable, and compatible with clinical deployment.