Alexander Scheffler

Alexander Scheffler

This paper discusses how latency guarantees for non-cyclic (feedforward) First-In-First-Out (FIFO) networks with shapers can be computed within the Network Calculus (NC) framework. Shapers are methods implemented in software or hardware and may reside inside the network and at the endpoint which constrain the rate and maximum packet sizes for the transmission of specific data streams (flows) or groups thereof. Shaping can improve latencies and is an important aspect of Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN). Several methods in NC exist to analyze FIFO networks. Among them is the Least Upper Delay Bound (LUDB) methodology. So far, LUDB does not incorporate shaping assumptions into its analysis. This paper addresses this gap resulting in the new methodology called LUDB++. The evaluation on a set of different line topologies and a tree topology with a total of 130 configurations shows that LUDB++ delivers more accurate latency bounds compared to LUDB. Moreover, the Exponential Linear Program (ELP) method, which considers FIFO and shaping inside the network, yields the most accurate bounds to this date. ELP is superseded by LUDB++ for most of cases by a margin of up to 9.13%.

Fabien Geyer, Alexander Scheffler, Steffen Bondorf

The derivation of upper bounds on data flows' worst-case traversal times is an important task in many application areas. For accurate bounds, model simplifications should be avoided even in large networks. Network Calculus (NC) provides a modeling framework and different analyses for delay bounding. We investigate the analysis of feedforward networks where all queues implement First-In First-Out (FIFO) service. Correctly considering the effect of data flows onto each other under FIFO is already a challenging task. Yet, the fastest available NC FIFO analysis suffers from limitations resulting in unnecessarily loose bounds. A feature called Flow Prolongation (FP) has been shown to improve delay bound accuracy significantly. Unfortunately, FP needs to be executed within the NC FIFO analysis very often and each time it creates an exponentially growing set of alternative networks with prolongations. FP therefore does not scale and has been out of reach for the exhaustive analysis of large networks. We introduce DeepFP, an approach to make FP scale by predicting prolongations using machine learning. In our evaluation, we show that DeepFP can improve results in FIFO networks considerably. Compared to the standard NC FIFO analysis, DeepFP reduces delay bounds by 12.1% on average at negligible additional computational cost.