1.9MLAug 14, 2021
Equity-Directed Bootstrapping: Examples and AnalysisHarish S. Bhat, Majerle E. Reeves, Sidra Goldman-Mellor
When faced with severely imbalanced binary classification problems, we often train models on bootstrapped data in which the number of instances of each class occur in a more favorable ratio, e.g., one. We view algorithmic inequity through the lens of imbalanced classification: in order to balance the performance of a classifier across groups, we can bootstrap to achieve training sets that are balanced with respect to both labels and group identity. For an example problem with severe class imbalance---prediction of suicide death from administrative patient records---we illustrate how an equity-directed bootstrap can bring test set sensitivities and specificities much closer to satisfying the equal odds criterion. In the context of naïve Bayes and logistic regression, we analyze the equity-directed bootstrap, demonstrating that it works by bringing odds ratios close to one, and linking it to methods involving intercept adjustment, thresholding, and weighting.
3.4MLNov 28, 2017
Predicting Adolescent Suicide Attempts with Neural NetworksHarish S. Bhat, Sidra J. Goldman-Mellor
Though suicide is a major public health problem in the US, machine learning methods are not commonly used to predict an individual's risk of attempting/committing suicide. In the present work, starting with an anonymized collection of electronic health records for 522,056 unique, California-resident adolescents, we develop neural network models to predict suicide attempts. We frame the problem as a binary classification problem in which we use a patient's data from 2006-2009 to predict either the presence (1) or absence (0) of a suicide attempt in 2010. After addressing issues such as severely imbalanced classes and the variable length of a patient's history, we build neural networks with depths varying from two to eight hidden layers. For test set observations where we have at least five ED/hospital visits' worth of data on a patient, our depth-4 model achieves a sensitivity of 0.703, specificity of 0.980, and AUC of 0.958.