AIMar 27, 2013
Computing Probability Intervals Under Independency ConstraintsLinda C. van der Gaag
Many AI researchers argue that probability theory is only capable of dealing with uncertainty in situations where a full specification of a joint probability distribution is available, and conclude that it is not suitable for application in knowledge-based systems. Probability intervals, however, constitute a means for expressing incompleteness of information. We present a method for computing such probability intervals for probabilities of interest from a partial specification of a joint probability distribution. Our method improves on earlier approaches by allowing for independency relationships between statistical variables to be exploited.
AIFeb 20, 2013
Elicitation of Probabilities for Belief Networks: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative InformationMarek J. Druzdzel, Linda C. van der Gaag
Although the usefulness of belief networks for reasoning under uncertainty is widely accepted, obtaining numerical probabilities that they require is still perceived a major obstacle. Often not enough statistical data is available to allow for reliable probability estimation. Available information may not be directly amenable for encoding in the network. Finally, domain experts may be reluctant to provide numerical probabilities. In this paper, we propose a method for elicitation of probabilities from a domain expert that is non-invasive and accommodates whatever probabilistic information the expert is willing to state. We express all available information, whether qualitative or quantitative in nature, in a canonical form consisting of (in) equalities expressing constraints on the hyperspace of possible joint probability distributions. We then use this canonical form to derive second-order probability distributions over the desired probabilities.
AIJan 23, 2013
How to Elicit Many ProbabilitiesLinda C. van der Gaag, Silja Renooij, Cilia L. M. Witteman et al.
In building Bayesian belief networks, the elicitation of all probabilities required can be a major obstacle. We learned the extent of this often-cited observation in the construction of the probabilistic part of a complex influence diagram in the field of cancer treatment. Based upon our negative experiences with existing methods, we designed a new method for probability elicitation from domain experts. The method combines various ideas, among which are the ideas of transcribing probabilities and of using a scale with both numerical and verbal anchors for marking assessments. In the construction of the probabilistic part of our influence diagram, the method proved to allow for the elicitation of many probabilities in little time.
AIJan 23, 2013
Enhancing QPNs for Trade-off ResolutionSilja Renooij, Linda C. van der Gaag
Qualitative probabilistic networks have been introduced as qualitative abstractions of Bayesian belief networks. One of the major drawbacks of these qualitative networks is their coarse level of detail, which may lead to unresolved trade-offs during inference. We present an enhanced formalism for qualitative networks with a finer level of detail. An enhanced qualitative probabilistic network differs from a regular qualitative network in that it distinguishes between strong and weak influences. Enhanced qualitative probabilistic networks are purely qualitative in nature, as regular qualitative networks are, yet allow for efficiently resolving trade-offs during inference.
AIJan 16, 2013
Pivotal Pruning of Trade-offs in QPNsSilja Renooij, Linda C. van der Gaag, Simon Parsons et al.
Qualitative probabilistic networks have been designed for probabilistic reasoning in a qualitative way. Due to their coarse level of representation detail, qualitative probabilistic networks do not provide for resolving trade-offs and typically yield ambiguous results upon inference. We present an algorithm for computing more insightful results for unresolved trade-offs. The algorithm builds upon the idea of using pivots to zoom in on the trade-offs and identifying the information that would serve to resolve them.
AIJan 16, 2013
Making Sensitivity Analysis Computationally EfficientUffe Kjærulff, Linda C. van der Gaag
To investigate the robustness of the output probabilities of a Bayesian network, a sensitivity analysis can be performed. A one-way sensitivity analysis establishes, for each of the probability parameters of a network, a function expressing a posterior marginal probability of interest in terms of the parameter. Current methods for computing the coefficients in such a function rely on a large number of network evaluations. In this paper, we present a method that requires just a single outward propagation in a junction tree for establishing the coefficients in the functions for all possible parameters; in addition, an inward propagation is required for processing evidence. Conversely, the method requires a single outward propagation for computing the coefficients in the functions expressing all possible posterior marginals in terms of a single parameter. We extend these results to an n-way sensitivity analysis in which sets of parameters are studied.
AIJan 10, 2013
Analysing Sensitivity Data from Probabilistic NetworksLinda C. van der Gaag, Silja Renooij
With the advance of efficient analytical methods for sensitivity analysis ofprobabilistic networks, the interest in the sensitivities revealed by real-life networks is rekindled. As the amount of data resulting from a sensitivity analysis of even a moderately-sized network is alreadyoverwhelming, methods for extracting relevant information are called for. One such methodis to study the derivative of the sensitivity functions yielded for a network's parameters. We further propose to build upon the concept of admissible deviation, that is, the extent to which a parameter can deviate from the true value without inducing a change in the most likely outcome. We illustrate these concepts by means of a sensitivity analysis of a real-life probabilistic network in oncology.
AIJan 10, 2013
Pre-processing for Triangulation of Probabilistic NetworksHans L. Bodlaender, Arie M. C. A. Koster, Frank van den Eijkhof et al.
The currently most efficient algorithm for inference with a probabilistic network builds upon a triangulation of a network's graph. In this paper, we show that pre-processing can help in finding good triangulations forprobabilistic networks, that is, triangulations with a minimal maximum clique size. We provide a set of rules for stepwise reducing a graph, without losing optimality. This reduction allows us to solve the triangulation problem on a smaller graph. From the smaller graph's triangulation, a triangulation of the original graph is obtained by reversing the reduction steps. Our experimental results show that the graphs of some well-known real-life probabilistic networks can be triangulated optimally just by preprocessing; for other networks, huge reductions in their graph's size are obtained.
AIOct 19, 2012
Upgrading Ambiguous Signs in QPNsJanneke H. Bolt, Silja Renooij, Linda C. van der Gaag
WA qualitative probabilistic network models the probabilistic relationships between its variables by means of signs. Non-monotonic influences have associated an ambiguous sign. These ambiguous signs typically lead to uninformative results upon inference. A non-monotonic influence can, however, be associated with a, more informative, sign that indicates its effect in the current state of the network. To capture this effect, we introduce the concept of situational sign. Furthermore, if the network converts to a state in which all variables that provoke the non-monotonicity have been observed, a non-monotonic influence reduces to a monotonic influence. We study the persistence and propagation of situational signs upon inference and give a method to establish the sign of a reduced influence.
AIJul 11, 2012
Evidence-invariant Sensitivity BoundsSilja Renooij, Linda C. van der Gaag
The sensitivities revealed by a sensitivity analysis of a probabilistic network typically depend on the entered evidence. For a real-life network therefore, the analysis is performed a number of times, with different evidence. Although efficient algorithms for sensitivity analysis exist, a complete analysis is often infeasible because of the large range of possible combinations of observations. In this paper we present a method for studying sensitivities that are invariant to the evidence entered. Our method builds upon the idea of establishing bounds between which a parameter can be varied without ever inducing a change in the most likely value of a variable of interest.
AIJul 11, 2012
Monotonicity in Bayesian NetworksLinda C. van der Gaag, Hans L. Bodlaender, Ad Feelders
For many real-life Bayesian networks, common knowledge dictates that the output established for the main variable of interest increases with higher values for the observable variables. We define two concepts of monotonicity to capture this type of knowledge. We say that a network is isotone in distribution if the probability distribution computed for the output variable given specific observations is stochastically dominated by any such distribution given higher-ordered observations; a network is isotone in mode if a probability distribution given higher observations has a higher mode. We show that establishing whether a network exhibits any of these properties of monotonicity is coNPPP-complete in general, and remains coNP-complete for polytrees. We present an approximate algorithm for deciding whether a network is monotone in distribution and illustrate its application to a real-life network in oncology.
AIJul 11, 2012
Stable Independance and Complexity of RepresentationPeter de Waal, Linda C. van der Gaag
The representation of independence relations generally builds upon the well-known semigraphoid axioms of independence. Recently, a representation has been proposed that captures a set of dominant statements of an independence relation from which any other statement can be generated by means of the axioms; the cardinality of this set is taken to indicate the complexity of the relation. Building upon the idea of dominance, we introduce the concept of stability to provide for a more compact representation of independence. We give an associated algorithm for establishing such a representation.We show that, with our concept of stability, many independence relations are found to be of lower complexity than with existing representations.
AIJul 4, 2012
Learning Bayesian Network Parameters with Prior Knowledge about Context-Specific Qualitative InfluencesAd Feelders, Linda C. van der Gaag
We present a method for learning the parameters of a Bayesian network with prior knowledge about the signs of influences between variables. Our method accommodates not just the standard signs, but provides for context-specific signs as well. We show how the various signs translate into order constraints on the network parameters and how isotonic regression can be used to compute order-constrained estimates from the available data. Our experimental results show that taking prior knowledge about the signs of influences into account leads to an improved fit of the true distribution, especially when only a small sample of data is available. Moreover, the computed estimates are guaranteed to be consistent with the specified signs, thereby resulting in a network that is more likely to be accepted by experts in its domain of application.
AIJul 4, 2012
Exploiting Evidence-dependent Sensitivity BoundsSilja Renooij, Linda C. van der Gaag
Studying the effects of one-way variation of any number of parameters on any number of output probabilities quickly becomes infeasible in practice, especially if various evidence profiles are to be taken into consideration. To provide for identifying the parameters that have a potentially large effect prior to actually performing the analysis, we need properties of sensitivity functions that are independent of the network under study, of the available evidence, or of both. In this paper, we study properties that depend upon just the probability of the entered evidence. We demonstrate that these properties provide for establishing an upper bound on the sensitivity value for a parameter; they further provide for establishing the region in which the vertex of the sensitivity function resides, thereby serving to identify parameters with a low sensitivity value that may still have a large impact on the probability of interest for relatively small parameter variations.
AIJul 4, 2012
Stable Independence in Perfect MapsPeter de Waal, Linda C. van der Gaag
With the aid of the concept of stable independence we can construct, in an efficient way, a compact representation of a semi-graphoid independence relation. We show that this representation provides a new necessary condition for the existence of a directed perfect map for the relation. The test for this condition is based to a large extent on the transitivity property of a special form of d-separation. The complexity of the test is linear in the size of the representation. The test, moreover, brings the additional benefit that it can be used to guide the early stages of network construction.
AIJun 27, 2012
Sensitivity Analysis for Threshold Decision Making with Dynamic NetworksTheodore Charitos, Linda C. van der Gaag
The effect of inaccuracies in the parameters of a dynamic Bayesian network can be investigated by subjecting the network to a sensitivity analysis. Having detailed the resulting sensitivity functions in our previous work, we now study the effect of parameter inaccuracies on a recommended decision in view of a threshold decision-making model. We detail the effect of varying a single and multiple parameters from a conditional probability table and present a computational procedure for establishing bounds between which assessments for these parameters can be varied without inducing a change in the recommended decision. We illustrate the various concepts involved by means of a real-life dynamic network in the field of infectious disease.
AIJun 13, 2012
The Computational Complexity of Sensitivity Analysis and Parameter TuningJohan Kwisthout, Linda C. van der Gaag
While known algorithms for sensitivity analysis and parameter tuning in probabilistic networks have a running time that is exponential in the size of the network, the exact computational complexity of these problems has not been established as yet. In this paper we study several variants of the tuning problem and show that these problems are NPPP-complete in general. We further show that the problems remain NP-complete or PP-complete, for a number of restricted variants. These complexity results provide insight in whether or not recent achievements in sensitivity analysis and tuning can be extended to more general, practicable methods.