Christoph Berkholz

Matthäus Micun, Christoph Berkholz

Since their introduction by Atserias, Kolaitis, and Vardi in 2004, proof systems where each line is represented by an ordered binary decision diagram (OBDD) have been intensively studied as they allow to compactly represent Boolean functions. We extend this line of work by considering representation formats that can be even more succinct than OBDDs and have gained a lot of attention in the area of knowledge compilation: sentential decision diagrams (SDDs) and deterministic structured DNNF circuits (d-SDNNFs). We show that both variants can provide strictly smaller refutations of unsatisfiable CNFs than their OBDD counterparts. Furthermore, we investigate the relative strength of these systems depending on which of the three fundamental derivation rules join, reordering, and weakening are allowed. Here we obtain several separations and identify interesting open problems. To streamline our proofs we establish a sat-to-unsat lifting theorem that might be of independent interest: it turns satisfiable CNFs that are hard to represent by SDDs and d-SDNNFs into unsatisfiable CNFs that are hard to refute in the corresponding proof system.

Christoph Berkholz

We establish optimal bounds on the number of nested propagation steps in $k$-consistency tests. It is known that local consistency algorithms such as arc-, path- and $k$-consistency are not efficiently parallelizable. Their inherent sequential nature is caused by long chains of nested propagation steps, which cannot be executed in parallel. This motivates the question "What is the minimum number of nested propagation steps that have to be performed by $k$-consistency algorithms on (binary) constraint networks with $n$ variables and domain size $d$?" It was known before that 2-consistency requires $Ω(nd)$ and 3-consistency requires $Ω(n^2)$ sequential propagation steps. We answer the question exhaustively for every $k\geq 2$: there are binary constraint networks where any $k$-consistency procedure has to perform $Ω(n^{k-1}d^{k-1})$ nested propagation steps before local inconsistencies were detected. This bound is tight, because the overall number of propagation steps performed by $k$-consistency is at most $n^{k-1}d^{k-1}$.

Christoph Berkholz, Oleg Verbitsky

Establishing arc consistency on two relational structures is one of the most popular heuristics for the constraint satisfaction problem. We aim at determining the time complexity of arc consistency testing. The input structures $G$ and $H$ can be supposed to be connected colored graphs, as the general problem reduces to this particular case. We first observe the upper bound $O(e(G)v(H)+v(G)e(H))$, which implies the bound $O(e(G)e(H))$ in terms of the number of edges and the bound $O((v(G)+v(H))^3)$ in terms of the number of vertices. We then show that both bounds are tight up to a constant factor as long as an arc consistency algorithm is based on constraint propagation (like any algorithm currently known). Our argument for the lower bounds is based on examples of slow constraint propagation. We measure the speed of constraint propagation observed on a pair $G,H$ by the size of a proof, in a natural combinatorial proof system, that Spoiler wins the existential 2-pebble game on $G,H$. The proof size is bounded from below by the game length $D(G,H)$, and a crucial ingredient of our analysis is the existence of $G,H$ with $D(G,H)=Ω(v(G)v(H))$. We find one such example among old benchmark instances for the arc consistency problem and also suggest a new, different construction.