40.0COMar 30
Clustered independence and bounded treewidthKolja Knauer, Torsten Ueckerdt
A set $S\subseteq V$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a \emph{$c$-clustered set} if it induces a subgraph with components of order at most $c$ each, and $α_c(G)$ denotes the size of a largest $c$-clustered set. For any graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and treewidth $k$, we show that $α_c(G) \geq \frac{c}{c+k+1}n$, which improves a result of Wood [arXiv:2208.10074, August 2022], while we construct $n$-vertex graphs $G$ of treewidth~$k$ with $α_c(G)\leq \frac{c}{c+k}n$. In the case $c\leq 2$ or $k=1$ we prove the better lower bound $α_c(G) \geq \frac{c}{c+k}n$, which settles a conjecture of Chappell and Pelsmajer [Electron.\ J.\ Comb., 2013] and is best-possible. Finally, in the case $c=3$ and $k=2$, we show $α_c(G) \geq \frac{5}{9}n$ and which is best-possible.
71.0CGMar 23
Flip Distance of Non-Crossing Spanning Trees: NP-Hardness and Improved BoundsHåvard Bakke Bjerkevik, Joseph Dorfer, Linda Kleist et al.
We consider the problem of reconfiguring non-crossing spanning trees on point sets. For a set $P$ of $n$ points in general position in the plane, the flip graph $F(P)$ has a vertex for each non-crossing spanning tree on $P$ and an edge between any two spanning trees that can be transformed into each other by the exchange of a single edge. This flip graph has been intensively studied, lately with an emphasis on determining its diameter diam$(F(P))$ for sets $P$ of $n$ points in convex position. The current best bounds are $\frac{14}{9}n-O(1) \leq$ diam$(F(P))<\frac{15}{9}n-3$ [Bjerkevik, Kleist, Ueckerdt, and Vogtenhuber; SODA 2025]. The crucial tool for both the upper and lower bound are so-called *conflict graphs*, which the authors stated might be the key ingredient for determining the diameter (up to lower-order terms). In this paper, we pick up the concept of conflict graphs and show that this tool is even more versatile than previously hoped. As our first main result, we use conflict graphs to show that computing the flip distance between two non-crossing spanning trees is NP-hard, even for point sets in convex position. Interestingly, the result still holds for more constrained flip operations, concretely, compatible flips (where the removed and the added edge do not cross) and rotations (where the removed and the added edge share an endpoint). Extending the line of research from [BKUV SODA25], we present new insights on the diameter of the flip graph. Their lower bound is based on a constant-size pair of trees, one of which is *stacked*. We show that if one of the trees is stacked, then the lower bound is indeed optimal up to a constant term, that is, there exists a flip sequence of length at most $\frac{14}{9}(n-1)$ to any other tree. Lastly, we improve the lower bound on the diameter of the flip graph $F(P)$ for $n$ points in convex position to $\frac{11}{7}n-o(n)$.
DSApr 23, 2013
On Semantic Word Cloud RepresentationLukas Barth, Stephen Kobourov, Sergey Pupyrev et al.
We study the problem of computing semantic-preserving word clouds in which semantically related words are close to each other. While several heuristic approaches have been described in the literature, we formalize the underlying geometric algorithm problem: Word Rectangle Adjacency Contact (WRAC). In this model each word is associated with rectangle with fixed dimensions, and the goal is to represent semantically related words by ensuring that the two corresponding rectangles touch. We design and analyze efficient polynomial-time algorithms for some variants of the WRAC problem, show that several general variants are NP-hard, and describe a number of approximation algorithms. Finally, we experimentally demonstrate that our theoretically-sound algorithms outperform the early heuristics.