Chun-Hsien Lin

Chun-Hsien Lin, Pu-Jen Cheng

Word embedding is a modern distributed word representations approach widely used in many natural language processing tasks. Converting the vocabulary in a legal document into a word embedding model facilitates subjecting legal documents to machine learning, deep learning, and other algorithms and subsequently performing the downstream tasks of natural language processing vis-à-vis, for instance, document classification, contract review, and machine translation. The most common and practical approach of accuracy evaluation with the word embedding model uses a benchmark set with linguistic rules or the relationship between words to perform analogy reasoning via algebraic calculation. This paper proposes establishing a 1,134 Legal Analogical Reasoning Questions Set (LARQS) from the 2,388 Chinese Codex corpus using five kinds of legal relations, which are then used to evaluate the accuracy of the Chinese word embedding model. Moreover, we discovered that legal relations might be ubiquitous in the word embedding model.

Chun-Hsien Lin, Bing-Fei Wu

Despite outstanding performance on public benchmarks, face recognition still suffers due to domain mismatch between training (source) and testing (target) data. Furthermore, these domains are not shared classes, which complicates domain adaptation. Since this is also a fine-grained classification problem which does not strictly follow the low-density separation principle, conventional domain adaptation approaches do not resolve these problems. In this paper, we formulate domain mismatch in face recognition as a style mismatch problem for which we propose two methods. First, we design a domain discriminator with human-level judgment to mine target-like images in the training data to mitigate the domain gap. Second, we extract style representations in low-level feature maps of the backbone model, and match the style distributions of the two domains to find a common style representation. Evaluations on verification and open-set and closed-set identification protocols show that both methods yield good improvements, and that performance is more robust if they are combined. Our approach is competitive with related work, and its effectiveness is verified in a practical application.