Fatma Özcan

Yannis Chronis, Yawen Wang, Yu Gan et al.

Cardinality estimation is crucial for enabling high query performance in relational databases. Recently learned cardinality estimation models have been proposed to improve accuracy but there is no systematic benchmark or datasets which allows researchers to evaluate the progress made by new learned approaches and even systematically develop new learned approaches. In this paper, we are releasing a benchmark, containing thousands of queries over 20 distinct real-world databases for learned cardinality estimation. In contrast to other initial benchmarks, our benchmark is much more diverse and can be used for training and testing learned models systematically. Using this benchmark, we explored whether learned cardinality estimation can be transferred to an unseen dataset in a zero-shot manner. We trained GNN-based and transformer-based models to study the problem in three setups: 1-) instance-based, 2-) zero-shot, and 3-) fine-tuned. Our results show that while we get promising results for zero-shot cardinality estimation on simple single table queries; as soon as we add joins, the accuracy drops. However, we show that with fine-tuning, we can still utilize pre-trained models for cardinality estimation, significantly reducing training overheads compared to instance specific models. We are open sourcing our scripts to collect statistics, generate queries and training datasets to foster more extensive research, also from the ML community on the important problem of cardinality estimation and in particular improve on recent directions such as pre-trained cardinality estimation.

Jiale Lao, Andreas Zimmerer, Olga Ovcharenko et al.

We present a benchmark targeting a novel class of systems: semantic query processing engines. Those systems rely inherently on generative and reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs). They extend SQL with semantic operators, configured by natural language instructions, that are evaluated via LLMs and enable users to perform various operations on multimodal data. Our benchmark introduces diversity across three key dimensions: scenarios, modalities, and operators. Included are scenarios ranging from movie review analysis to medical question-answering. Within these scenarios, we cover different data modalities, including images, audio, and text. Finally, the queries involve a diverse set of operators, including semantic filters, joins, mappings, ranking, and classification operators. We evaluated our benchmark on three academic systems (LOTUS, Palimpzest, and ThalamusDB) and one industrial system, Google BigQuery. Although these results reflect a snapshot of systems under continuous development, our study offers crucial insights into their current strengths and weaknesses, illuminating promising directions for future research.

Wojciech Kosiuk, Xingyu Ji, Yeounoh Chung et al.

Enabling question answering over tables and databases in natural language has become a key capability in the democratization of insights from tabular data sources. These systems first require retrieval of data that is relevant to a given natural language query, for which several methods have been introduced. In this work we present and study a table retrieval mechanism devising fine-grained typed query decomposition and global connectivity-awareness (DCTR), to handle the challenges induced by open-domain question answering over relational databases in complex usage contexts. We evaluate the effectiveness of the two mechanisms through the lens of retrieval complexity which we measure along the axes of query- and data complexity. Our analyses over industry-aligned benchmarks illustrate the robustness of DCTR for highly composite queries and densely connected databases.

Alina Vretinaris, Chuan Lei, Vasilis Efthymiou et al.

Medical knowledge bases (KBs), distilled from biomedical literature and regulatory actions, are expected to provide high-quality information to facilitate clinical decision making. Entity disambiguation (also referred to as entity linking) is considered as an essential task in unlocking the wealth of such medical KBs. However, existing medical entity disambiguation methods are not adequate due to word discrepancies between the entities in the KB and the text snippets in the source documents. Recently, graph neural networks (GNNs) have proven to be very effective and provide state-of-the-art results for many real-world applications with graph-structured data. In this paper, we introduce ED-GNN based on three representative GNNs (GraphSAGE, R-GCN, and MAGNN) for medical entity disambiguation. We develop two optimization techniques to fine-tune and improve ED-GNN. First, we introduce a novel strategy to represent entities that are mentioned in text snippets as a query graph. Second, we design an effective negative sampling strategy that identifies hard negative samples to improve the model's disambiguation capability. Compared to the best performing state-of-the-art solutions, our ED-GNN offers an average improvement of 7.3% in terms of F1 score on five real-world datasets.

Edgar Meij, Tara Safavi, Chenyan Xiong et al.

The KG-BIAS 2020 workshop touches on biases and how they surface in knowledge graphs (KGs), biases in the source data that is used to create KGs, methods for measuring or remediating bias in KGs, but also identifying other biases such as how and which languages are represented in automatically constructed KGs or how personal KGs might incur inherent biases. The goal of this workshop is to uncover how various types of biases are introduced into KGs, investigate how to measure, and propose methods to remediate them.