Andrey Radul

Michael Bukatin, Steve Matthews, Andrey Radul

Dataflow matrix machines arise naturally in the context of synchronous dataflow programming with linear streams. They can be viewed as a rather powerful generalization of recurrent neural networks. Similarly to recurrent neural networks, large classes of dataflow matrix machines are described by matrices of numbers, and therefore dataflow matrix machines can be synthesized by computing their matrices. At the same time, the evidence is fairly strong that dataflow matrix machines have sufficient expressive power to be a convenient general-purpose programming platform. Because of the network nature of this platform, programming patterns often correspond to patterns of connectivity in the generalized recurrent neural networks understood as programs. This paper explores a variety of such programming patterns.

Michael Bukatin, Steve Matthews, Andrey Radul

Dataflow matrix machines are a powerful generalization of recurrent neural networks. They work with multiple types of linear streams and multiple types of neurons, including higher-order neurons which dynamically update the matrix describing weights and topology of the network in question while the network is running. It seems that the power of dataflow matrix machines is sufficient for them to be a convenient general purpose programming platform. This paper explores a number of useful programming idioms and constructions arising in this context.

Michael Bukatin, Steve Matthews, Andrey Radul

Dataflow matrix machines are a powerful generalization of recurrent neural networks. They work with multiple types of arbitrary linear streams, multiple types of powerful neurons, and allow to incorporate higher-order constructions. We expect them to be useful in machine learning and probabilistic programming, and in the synthesis of dynamic systems and of deterministic and probabilistic programs.