Jinglan Liu

h-index20
2papers
1,489citations

2 Papers

20.7LGMar 5, 2019Code
Revisiting the Evaluation of Uncertainty Estimation and Its Application to Explore Model Complexity-Uncertainty Trade-Off

Yukun Ding, Jinglan Liu, Jinjun Xiong et al.

Accurately estimating uncertainties in neural network predictions is of great importance in building trusted DNNs-based models, and there is an increasing interest in providing accurate uncertainty estimation on many tasks, such as security cameras and autonomous driving vehicles. In this paper, we focus on the two main use cases of uncertainty estimation, i.e. selective prediction and confidence calibration. We first reveal potential issues of commonly used quality metrics for uncertainty estimation in both use cases, and propose our new metrics to mitigate them. We then apply these new metrics to explore the trade-off between model complexity and uncertainty estimation quality, a critically missing work in the literature. Our empirical experiment results validate the superiority of the proposed metrics, and some interesting trends about the complexity-uncertainty trade-off are observed.

14.7LGFeb 10, 2018
On the Universal Approximability and Complexity Bounds of Quantized ReLU Neural Networks

Yukun Ding, Jinglan Liu, Jinjun Xiong et al.

Compression is a key step to deploy large neural networks on resource-constrained platforms. As a popular compression technique, quantization constrains the number of distinct weight values and thus reducing the number of bits required to represent and store each weight. In this paper, we study the representation power of quantized neural networks. First, we prove the universal approximability of quantized ReLU networks on a wide class of functions. Then we provide upper bounds on the number of weights and the memory size for a given approximation error bound and the bit-width of weights for function-independent and function-dependent structures. Our results reveal that, to attain an approximation error bound of $ε$, the number of weights needed by a quantized network is no more than $\mathcal{O}\left(\log^5(1/ε)\right)$ times that of an unquantized network. This overhead is of much lower order than the lower bound of the number of weights needed for the error bound, supporting the empirical success of various quantization techniques. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in-depth study on the complexity bounds of quantized neural networks.