Rebecca R. Vos

Gerardo Roa Dabike, Michael A. Akeroyd, Scott Bannister et al.

This paper reports on the design and results of the 2024 ICASSP SP Cadenza Challenge: Music Demixing/Remixing for Hearing Aids. The Cadenza project is working to enhance the audio quality of music for those with a hearing loss. The scenario for the challenge was listening to stereo reproduction over loudspeakers via hearing aids. The task was to: decompose pop/rock music into vocal, drums, bass and other (VDBO); rebalance the different tracks with specified gains and then remixing back to stereo. End-to-end approaches were also accepted. 17 systems were submitted by 11 teams. Causal systems performed poorer than non-causal approaches. 9 systems beat the baseline. A common approach was to fine-tuning pretrained demixing models. The best approach used an ensemble of models.

Gerardo Roa Dabike, Michael A. Akeroyd, Scott Bannister et al.

It is well established that listening to music is an issue for those with hearing loss, and hearing aids are not a universal solution. How can machine learning be used to address this? This paper details the first application of the open challenge methodology to use machine learning to improve audio quality of music for those with hearing loss. The first challenge was a stand-alone competition (CAD1) and had 9 entrants. The second was an 2024 ICASSP grand challenge (ICASSP24) and attracted 17 entrants. The challenge tasks concerned demixing and remixing pop/rock music to allow a personalised rebalancing of the instruments in the mix, along with amplification to correct for raised hearing thresholds. The software baselines provided for entrants to build upon used two state-of-the-art demix algorithms: Hybrid Demucs and Open-Unmix. Evaluation of systems was done using the objective metric HAAQI, the Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index. No entrants improved on the best baseline in CAD1 because there was insufficient room for improvement. Consequently, for ICASSP24 the scenario was made more difficult by using loudspeaker reproduction and specified gains to be applied before remixing. This also made the scenario more useful for listening through hearing aids. 9 entrants scored better than the the best ICASSP24 baseline. Most entrants used a refined version of Hybrid Demucs and NAL-R amplification. The highest scoring system combined the outputs of several demixing algorithms in an ensemble approach. These challenges are now open benchmarks for future research with the software and data being freely available.

Gerardo Roa-Dabike, Trevor J. Cox, Jon P. Barker et al.

Musical (MSS) source separation of western popular music using non-causal deep learning can be very effective. In contrast, MSS for classical music is an unsolved problem. Classical ensembles are harder to separate than popular music because of issues such as the inherent greater variation in the music; the sparsity of recordings with ground truth for supervised training; and greater ambiguity between instruments. The Cadenza project has been exploring MSS for classical music. This is being done so music can be remixed to improve listening experiences for people with hearing loss. To enable the work, a new database of synthesized woodwind ensembles was created to overcome instrumental imbalances in the EnsembleSet. For the MSS, a set of ConvTasNet models was used with each model being trained to extract a string or woodwind instrument. ConvTasNet was chosen because it enabled both causal and non-causal approaches to be tested. Non-causal approaches have dominated MSS work and are useful for recorded music, but for live music or processing on hearing aids, causal signal processing is needed. The MSS performance was evaluated on the two small datasets (Bach10 and URMP) of real instrument recordings where the ground-truth is available. The performances of the causal and non-causal systems were similar. Comparing the average Signal-to-Distortion (SDR) of the synthesized validation set (6.2 dB causal; 6.9 non-causal), to the real recorded evaluation set (0.3 dB causal, 0.4 dB non-causal), shows that mismatch between synthesized and recorded data is a problem. Future work needs to either gather more real recordings that can be used for training, or to improve the realism and diversity of the synthesized recordings to reduce the mismatch...