Abhishek Sinha

Naram Mhaisen, Abhishek Sinha, Georgios Paschos et al.

We take a systematic look at the problem of storing whole files in a cache with limited capacity in the context of optimistic learning, where the caching policy has access to a prediction oracle (provided by, e.g., a Neural Network). The successive file requests are assumed to be generated by an adversary, and no assumption is made on the accuracy of the oracle. In this setting, we provide a universal lower bound for prediction-assisted online caching and proceed to design a suite of policies with a range of performance-complexity trade-offs. All proposed policies offer sublinear regret bounds commensurate with the accuracy of the oracle. Our results substantially improve upon all recently-proposed online caching policies, which, being unable to exploit the oracle predictions, offer only $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret. In this pursuit, we design, to the best of our knowledge, the first comprehensive optimistic Follow-the-Perturbed leader policy, which generalizes beyond the caching problem. We also study the problem of caching files with different sizes and the bipartite network caching problem. Finally, we evaluate the efficacy of the proposed policies through extensive numerical experiments using real-world traces.

Abhishek Sinha, Ativ Joshi, Rajarshi Bhattacharjee et al.

We consider a fair resource allocation problem in the no-regret setting against an unrestricted adversary. The objective is to allocate resources equitably among several agents in an online fashion so that the difference of the aggregate $α$-fair utilities of the agents between an optimal static clairvoyant allocation and that of the online policy grows sub-linearly with time. The problem is challenging due to the non-additive nature of the $α$-fairness function. Previously, it was shown that no online policy can exist for this problem with a sublinear standard regret. In this paper, we propose an efficient online resource allocation policy, called Online Proportional Fair (OPF), that achieves $c_α$-approximate sublinear regret with the approximation factor $c_α=(1-α)^{-(1-α)}\leq 1.445,$ for $0\leq α< 1$. The upper bound to the $c_α$-regret for this problem exhibits a surprising phase transition phenomenon. The regret bound changes from a power-law to a constant at the critical exponent $α=\frac{1}{2}.$ As a corollary, our result also resolves an open problem raised by Even-Dar et al. [2009] on designing an efficient no-regret policy for the online job scheduling problem in certain parameter regimes. The proof of our results introduces new algorithmic and analytical techniques, including greedy estimation of the future gradients for non-additive global reward functions and bootstrapping adaptive regret bounds, which may be of independent interest.

Abhishek Sinha

Classic no-regret multi-armed bandit algorithms, including the Upper Confidence Bound (UCB), Hedge, and EXP3, are inherently unfair by design. Their unfairness stems from their objective of playing the most rewarding arm as frequently as possible while ignoring the rest. In this paper, we consider a fair prediction problem in the stochastic setting with a guaranteed minimum rate of accrual of rewards for each arm. We study the problem in both full-information and bandit feedback settings. Combining queueing-theoretic techniques with adversarial bandits, we propose a new online policy, called BanditQ, that achieves the target reward rates while conceding a regret and target rate violation penalty of at most $O(T^{\frac{3}{4}}).$ The regret bound in the full-information setting can be further improved to $O(\sqrt{T})$ under either a monotonicity assumption or when considering time-averaged regret. The proposed policy is efficient and admits a black-box reduction from the fair prediction problem to the standard adversarial MAB problem. The analysis of the BanditQ policy involves a new self-bounding inequality, which might be of independent interest.

Ativ Joshi, Abhishek Sinha

In learning theory, the performance of an online policy is commonly measured in terms of the static regret metric, which compares the cumulative loss of an online policy to that of an optimal benchmark in hindsight. In the definition of static regret, the action of the benchmark policy remains fixed throughout the time horizon. Naturally, the resulting regret bounds become loose in non-stationary settings where fixed actions often suffer from poor performance. In this paper, we investigate a stronger notion of regret minimization in the context of online caching. In particular, we allow the action of the benchmark at any round to be decided by a finite state machine containing any number of states. Popular caching policies, such as LRU and FIFO, belong to this class. Using ideas from the universal prediction literature in information theory, we propose an efficient online caching policy with a sub-linear regret bound. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first data-dependent regret bound known for the caching problem in the universal setting. We establish this result by combining a recently-proposed online caching policy with an incremental parsing algorithm, namely Lempel-Ziv '78. Our methods also yield a simpler learning-theoretic proof of the improved regret bound as opposed to the involved problem-specific combinatorial arguments used in the earlier works.

Sourav Sahoo, Siddhant Chaudhary, Samrat Mukhopadhyay et al.

We revisit the classic problem of optimal subset selection in the online learning set-up. Assume that the set $[N]$ consists of $N$ distinct elements. On the $t$th round, an adversary chooses a monotone reward function $f_t: 2^{[N]} \to \mathbb{R}_+$ that assigns a non-negative reward to each subset of $[N].$ An online policy selects (perhaps randomly) a subset $S_t \subseteq [N]$ consisting of $k$ elements before the reward function $f_t$ for the $t$th round is revealed to the learner. As a consequence of its choice, the policy receives a reward of $f_t(S_t)$ on the $t$th round. Our goal is to design an online sequential subset selection policy to maximize the expected cumulative reward accumulated over a time horizon. In this connection, we propose an online learning policy called SCore (Subset Selection with Core) that solves the problem for a large class of reward functions. The proposed SCore policy is based on a new polyhedral characterization of the reward functions called $α$-Core - a generalization of Core from the cooperative game theory literature. We establish a learning guarantee for the SCore policy in terms of a new performance metric called $α$-augmented regret. In this new metric, the performance of the online policy is compared with an unrestricted offline benchmark that can select all $N$ elements at every round. We show that a large class of reward functions, including submodular, can be efficiently optimized with the SCore policy. We also extend the proposed policy to the optimistic learning set-up where the learner has access to additional untrusted hints regarding the reward functions. Finally, we conclude the paper with a list of open problems.

Abhishek Sinha, Rahul Vaze

A well-studied generalization of the standard online convex optimization (OCO) framework is constrained online convex optimization (COCO). In COCO, on every round, a convex cost function and a convex constraint function are revealed to the learner after it chooses the action for that round. The objective is to design an online learning policy that simultaneously achieves a small regret while ensuring a small cumulative constraint violation (CCV) against an adaptive adversary interacting over a horizon of length $T$. A long-standing open question in COCO is whether an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ CCV without any restrictive assumptions. For the first time, we answer this in the affirmative and show that a simple first-order policy can simultaneously achieve these bounds. Furthermore, in the case of strongly convex cost and convex constraint functions, the regret guarantee can be improved to $O(\log T)$ while keeping the CCV bound the same as above. We establish these results by effectively combining adaptive OCO policies as a blackbox with Lyapunov optimization - a classic tool from control theory. Surprisingly, the analysis is short and elegant.

Siddhant Chaudhary, Abhishek Sinha

Contextual bandit algorithms are at the core of many applications, including recommender systems, clinical trials, and optimal portfolio selection. One of the most popular problems studied in the contextual bandit literature is to maximize the sum of the rewards in each round by ensuring a sublinear regret against the best-fixed context-dependent policy. However, in many applications, the cumulative reward is not the right objective - the bandit algorithm must be fair in order to avoid the echo-chamber effect and comply with the regulatory requirements. In this paper, we consider the $α$-Fair Contextual Bandits problem, where the objective is to maximize the global $α$-fair utility function - a non-decreasing concave function of the cumulative rewards in the adversarial setting. The problem is challenging due to the non-separability of the objective across rounds. We design an efficient algorithm that guarantees an approximately sublinear regret in the full-information and bandit feedback settings.

Dhruv Sarkar, Aprameyo Chakrabartty, Subhamon Supantha et al.

We study a generalization of the Online Convex Optimization (OCO) framework with time-varying adversarial constraints. In this problem, after selecting a feasible action from the convex decision set $X,$ a convex constraint function is revealed alongside the cost function in each round. Our goal is to design a computationally efficient learning policy that achieves a small regret with respect to the cost functions and a small cumulative constraint violation (CCV) with respect to the constraint functions over a horizon of length $T$. It is well-known that the projection step constitutes the major computational bottleneck of the standard OCO algorithms. However, for many structured decision sets, linear functions can be efficiently optimized over the decision set. We propose a *projection-free* online policy which makes a single call to a Linear Program (LP) solver per round. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art projection-free online algorithms with adversarial constraints, achieving improved bounds of $\tilde{O}(T^{\frac{3}{4}})$ for both regret and CCV. The proposed algorithm is conceptually simple - it first constructs a surrogate cost function as a non-negative linear combination of the cost and constraint functions. Then, it passes the surrogate costs to a new, adaptive version of the online conditional gradient subroutine, which we propose in this paper.

Abhishek Sinha, Rahul Vaze

A well-studied generalization of the standard online convex optimization (OCO) is constrained online convex optimization (COCO). In COCO, on every round, a convex cost function and a convex constraint function are revealed to the learner after the action for that round is chosen. The objective is to design an online policy that simultaneously achieves a small regret while ensuring small cumulative constraint violation (CCV) against an adaptive adversary. A long-standing open question in COCO is whether an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret and $O(\sqrt{T})$ CCV without any restrictive assumptions. For the first time, we answer this in the affirmative and show that an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ CCV. We establish this result by effectively combining the adaptive regret bound of the AdaGrad algorithm with Lyapunov optimization - a classic tool from control theory. Surprisingly, the analysis is short and elegant.

Subhamon Supantha, Abhishek Sinha

We consider a generalization of the celebrated Online Convex Optimization (OCO) framework with online adversarial constraints. We present two algorithms having simple modular structures that yield universal dynamic regret and cumulative constraint violation bounds, improving upon the state-of-the-art results. Our results hold in the most general case when both the cost and constraint functions are chosen arbitrarily by an adversary, and the constraint functions need not contain any common feasible point. The results are established by reducing the constrained learning problem to an instance of the standard OCO problem with specially constructed surrogate cost functions.

Abhishek Sinha, Rahul Vaze

We study Online Convex Optimization with adversarial constraints (COCO). At each round a learner selects an action from a convex decision set and then an adversary reveals a convex cost and a convex constraint function. The goal of the learner is to select a sequence of actions to minimize both regret and the cumulative constraint violation (CCV) over a horizon of length $T$. The best-known policy for this problem achieves $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ CCV. In this paper, we improve this by trading off regret to achieve substantially smaller CCV. This trade-off is especially important in safety-critical applications, where satisfying the safety constraints is non-negotiable. Specifically, for any bounded convex cost and constraint functions, we propose an online policy that achieves $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{dT}+ T^β)$ regret and $\tilde{O}(dT^{1-β})$ CCV, where $d$ is the dimension of the decision set and $β\in [0,1]$ is a tunable parameter. We begin with a special case, called the $\textsf{Constrained Expert}$ problem, where the decision set is a probability simplex and the cost and constraint functions are linear. Leveraging a new adaptive small-loss regret bound, we propose a computationally efficient policy for the $\textsf{Constrained Expert}$ problem, that attains $O(\sqrt{T\ln N}+T^β)$ regret and $\tilde{O}(T^{1-β} \ln N)$ CCV for $N$ number of experts. The original problem is then reduced to the $\textsf{Constrained Expert}$ problem via a covering argument. Finally, with an additional $M$-smoothness assumption, we propose a computationally efficient first-order policy attaining $O(\sqrt{MT}+T^β)$ regret and $\tilde{O}(MT^{1-β})$ CCV.

Rahul Vaze, Abhishek Sinha

The constrained version of the standard online convex optimization (OCO) framework, called COCO is considered, where on every round, a convex cost function and a convex constraint function are revealed to the learner after it chooses the action for that round. The objective is to simultaneously minimize the static regret and cumulative constraint violation (CCV). An algorithm is proposed that guarantees a static regret of $O(\sqrt{T})$ and a CCV of $\min\{\cV, O(\sqrt{T}\log T) \}$, where $\cV$ depends on the distance between the consecutively revealed constraint sets, the shape of constraint sets, dimension of action space and the diameter of the action space. For special cases of constraint sets, $\cV=O(1)$. Compared to the state of the art results, static regret of $O(\sqrt{T})$ and CCV of $O(\sqrt{T}\log T)$, that were universal, the new result on CCV is instance dependent, which is derived by exploiting the geometric properties of the constraint sets.

G Krishnakumar, Abhishek Sinha

We consider an online channel scheduling problem for a single transmitter-receiver pair equipped with $N$ arbitrarily varying wireless channels. The transmission rates of the channels might be non-stationary and could be controlled by an oblivious adversary. At every slot, incoming data arrives at an infinite-capacity data queue located at the transmitter. A scheduler, which is oblivious to the current channel rates, selects one of the $N$ channels for transmission. At the end of the slot, the scheduler only gets to know the transmission rate of the selected channel. The objective is to minimize the queue length regret, defined as the difference between the queue length at some time $T$ achieved by an online policy and the queue length obtained by always transmitting over the single best channel in hindsight. We propose a weakly adaptive Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) algorithm for minimizing the queue length regret in this setup. Unlike previous works, we do not make any stability assumptions about the queue or the arrival process. Hence, our result holds even when the queueing process is unstable. Our main observation is that the queue length regret can be upper bounded by the regret of a MAB policy that competes against the best channel in hindsight uniformly over all sub-intervals of $[T]$. As a technical contribution of independent interest, we then propose a weakly adaptive adversarial MAB policy which achieves $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N}T^{\frac{3}{4}})$ regret with high probability, implying the same bound for queue length regret.

Samrat Mukhopadhyay, Sourav Sahoo, Abhishek Sinha

We introduce the $\texttt{$k$-experts}$ problem - a generalization of the classic Prediction with Expert's Advice framework. Unlike the classic version, where the learner selects exactly one expert from a pool of $N$ experts at each round, in this problem, the learner can select a subset of $k$ experts at each round $(1\leq k\leq N)$. The reward obtained by the learner at each round is assumed to be a function of the $k$ selected experts. The primary objective is to design an online learning policy with a small regret. In this pursuit, we propose $\texttt{SAGE}$ ($\textbf{Sa}$mpled Hed$\textbf{ge}$) - a framework for designing efficient online learning policies by leveraging statistical sampling techniques. For a wide class of reward functions, we show that $\texttt{SAGE}$ either achieves the first sublinear regret guarantee or improves upon the existing ones. Furthermore, going beyond the notion of regret, we fully characterize the mistake bounds achievable by online learning policies for stable loss functions. We conclude the paper by establishing a tight regret lower bound for a variant of the $\texttt{$k$-experts}$ problem and carrying out experiments with standard datasets.

Samrat Mukhopadhyay, Abhishek Sinha

We consider the classical uncoded caching problem from an online learning point-of-view. A cache of limited storage capacity can hold $C$ files at a time from a large catalog. A user requests an arbitrary file from the catalog at each time slot. Before the file request from the user arrives, a caching policy populates the cache with any $C$ files of its choice. In the case of a cache-hit, the policy receives a unit reward and zero rewards otherwise. In addition to that, there is a cost associated with fetching files to the cache, which we refer to as the switching cost. The objective is to design a caching policy that incurs minimal regret while considering both the rewards due to cache-hits and the switching cost due to the file fetches. The main contribution of this paper is the switching regret analysis of a Follow the Perturbed Leader-based anytime caching policy, which is shown to have an order optimal switching regret. In this pursuit, we improve the best-known switching regret bound for this problem by a factor of $Θ(\sqrt{C}).$ We conclude the paper by comparing the performance of different popular caching policies using a publicly available trace from a commercial CDN server.

Debjit Paria, Abhishek Sinha

We consider an online prediction problem in the context of network caching. Assume that multiple users are connected to several caches via a bipartite network. At any time slot, each user may request an arbitrary file chosen from a large catalog. A user's request at a slot is met if the requested file is cached in at least one of the caches connected to the user. Our objective is to predict, prefetch, and optimally distribute the files on the caches at each slot to maximize the total number of cache hits. The problem is non-trivial due to the non-convex and non-smooth nature of the objective function. In this paper, we propose $\texttt{LeadCache}$ - an efficient online caching policy based on the Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader paradigm. We show that $\texttt{LeadCache}$ is regret-optimal up to a factor of $\tilde{O}(n^{3/8}),$ where $n$ is the number of users. We design two efficient implementations of the $\texttt{LeadCache}$ policy, one based on Pipage rounding and the other based on Madow's sampling, each of which makes precisely one call to an LP-solver per iteration. Furthermore, with a Strong-Law-type assumption, we show that the total number of file fetches under $\texttt{LeadCache}$ remains almost surely finite over an infinite horizon. Finally, we derive an approximately tight regret lower bound using results from graph coloring. We conclude that the learning-based $\texttt{LeadCache}$ policy decisively outperforms the state-of-the-art caching policies both theoretically and empirically.

Aditya Pandey, Abhishek Sinha, Aishwarya PS

A large amount of work has been done on the KDD 99 dataset, most of which includes the use of a hybrid anomaly and misuse detection model done in parallel with each other. In order to further classify the intrusions, our approach to network intrusion detection includes use of two different anomaly detection models followed by misuse detection applied on the combined output obtained from the previous step. The end goal of this is to verify the anomalies detected by the anomaly detection algorithm and clarify whether they are actually intrusions or random outliers from the trained normal (and thus to try and reduce the number of false positives). We aim to detect a pattern in this novel intrusion technique itself, and not the handling of such intrusions. The intrusions were detected to a very high degree of accuracy.