4.4LGDec 20, 2021
Bayesian neural network priors for edge-preserving inversionChen Li, Matthew Dunlop, Georg Stadler
We consider Bayesian inverse problems wherein the unknown state is assumed to be a function with discontinuous structure a priori. A class of prior distributions based on the output of neural networks with heavy-tailed weights is introduced, motivated by existing results concerning the infinite-width limit of such networks. We show theoretically that samples from such priors have desirable discontinuous-like properties even when the network width is finite, making them appropriate for edge-preserving inversion. Numerically we consider deconvolution problems defined on one- and two-dimensional spatial domains to illustrate the effectiveness of these priors; MAP estimation, dimension-robust MCMC sampling and ensemble-based approximations are utilized to probe the posterior distribution. The accuracy of point estimates is shown to exceed those obtained from non-heavy tailed priors, and uncertainty estimates are shown to provide more useful qualitative information.
1.2STMay 10, 2019
Hyperparameter Estimation in Bayesian MAP Estimation: Parameterizations and ConsistencyMatthew M. Dunlop, Tapio Helin, Andrew M. Stuart
The Bayesian formulation of inverse problems is attractive for three primary reasons: it provides a clear modelling framework; means for uncertainty quantification; and it allows for principled learning of hyperparameters. The posterior distribution may be explored by sampling methods, but for many problems it is computationally infeasible to do so. In this situation maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimators are often sought. Whilst these are relatively cheap to compute, and have an attractive variational formulation, a key drawback is their lack of invariance under change of parameterization. This is a particularly significant issue when hierarchical priors are employed to learn hyperparameters. In this paper we study the effect of the choice of parameterization on MAP estimators when a conditionally Gaussian hierarchical prior distribution is employed. Specifically we consider the centred parameterization, the natural parameterization in which the unknown state is solved for directly, and the noncentred parameterization, which works with a whitened Gaussian as the unknown state variable, and arises when considering dimension-robust MCMC algorithms; MAP estimation is well-defined in the nonparametric setting only for the noncentred parameterization. However, we show that MAP estimates based on the noncentred parameterization are not consistent as estimators of hyperparameters; conversely, we show that limits of finite-dimensional centred MAP estimators are consistent as the dimension tends to infinity. We also consider empirical Bayesian hyperparameter estimation, show consistency of these estimates, and demonstrate that they are more robust with respect to noise than centred MAP estimates. An underpinning concept throughout is that hyperparameters may only be recovered up to measure equivalence, a well-known phenomenon in the context of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process.
12.0MLMay 23, 2018
Large Data and Zero Noise Limits of Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning AlgorithmsMatthew M. Dunlop, Dejan Slepčev, Andrew M. Stuart et al.
Scalings in which the graph Laplacian approaches a differential operator in the large graph limit are used to develop understanding of a number of algorithms for semi-supervised learning; in particular the extension, to this graph setting, of the probit algorithm, level set and kriging methods, are studied. Both optimization and Bayesian approaches are considered, based around a regularizing quadratic form found from an affine transformation of the Laplacian, raised to a, possibly fractional, exponent. Conditions on the parameters defining this quadratic form are identified under which well-defined limiting continuum analogues of the optimization and Bayesian semi-supervised learning problems may be found, thereby shedding light on the design of algorithms in the large graph setting. The large graph limits of the optimization formulations are tackled through $Γ-$convergence, using the recently introduced $TL^p$ metric. The small labelling noise limits of the Bayesian formulations are also identified, and contrasted with pre-existing harmonic function approaches to the problem.
9.7MEMar 9, 2018
Dimension-Robust MCMC in Bayesian Inverse ProblemsVictor Chen, Matthew M. Dunlop, Omiros Papaspiliopoulos et al.
The methodology developed in this article is motivated by a wide range of prediction and uncertainty quantification problems that arise in Statistics, Machine Learning and Applied Mathematics, such as non-parametric regression, multi-class classification and inversion of partial differential equations. One popular formulation of such problems is as Bayesian inverse problems, where a prior distribution is used to regularize inference on a high-dimensional latent state, typically a function or a field. It is common that such priors are non-Gaussian, for example piecewise-constant or heavy-tailed, and/or hierarchical, in the sense of involving a further set of low-dimensional parameters, which, for example, control the scale or smoothness of the latent state. In this formulation prediction and uncertainty quantification relies on efficient exploration of the posterior distribution of latent states and parameters. This article introduces a framework for efficient MCMC sampling in Bayesian inverse problems that capitalizes upon two fundamental ideas in MCMC, non-centred parameterisations of hierarchical models and dimension-robust samplers for latent Gaussian processes. Using a range of diverse applications we showcase that the proposed framework is dimension-robust, that is, the efficiency of the MCMC sampling does not deteriorate as the dimension of the latent state gets higher. We showcase the full potential of the machinery we develop in the article in semi-supervised multi-class classification, where our sampling algorithm is used within an active learning framework to guide the selection of input data to manually label in order to achieve high predictive accuracy with a minimal number of labelled data.
1.2PRSep 9, 2016
The Bayesian Formulation of EIT: Analysis and AlgorithmsMatthew M. Dunlop, Andrew M. Stuart
We provide a rigorous Bayesian formulation of the EIT problem in an infinite dimensional setting, leading to well-posedness in the Hellinger metric with respect to the data. We focus particularly on the reconstruction of binary fields where the interface between different media is the primary unknown. We consider three different prior models - log-Gaussian, star-shaped and level set. Numerical simulations based on the implementation of MCMC are performed, illustrating the advantages and disadvantages of each type of prior in the reconstruction, in the case where the true conductivity is a binary field, and exhibiting the properties of the resulting posterior distribution.