Necva Bolucu

2papers

2 Papers

81.3HCMar 12
To Believe or Not To Believe: Comparing Supporting Information Tools to Aid Human Judgments of AI Veracity

Jessica Irons, Patrick Cooper, Necva Bolucu et al.

With increasing awareness of the hallucination risks of generative artificial intelligence (AI), we see a growing shift toward providing information tooling to help users determine the veracity of AI-generated answers for themselves. User responsibility for assessing veracity is particularly critical for certain sectors that rely on on-demand, AI-generated data extraction, such as biomedical research and the legal sector. While prior work offers us a variety of ways in which systems can provide such support, there is a lack of empirical evidence on how this information is actually incorporated into the user's decision-making process. Our user study takes a step toward filling this knowledge gap. In the context of a generative AI data extraction tool, we examine the relationship between the type of supporting information (full source text, passage retrieval, and Large Language Model (LLM) explanations) and user behavior in the veracity assessment process, examined through the lens of efficiency, effectiveness, reliance and trust. We find that passage retrieval offers a reasonable compromise between accuracy and speed, with judgments of veracity comparable to using the full source text. LLM explanations, while also enabling rapid assessments, fostered inappropriate reliance and trust on the data extraction AI, such that participants were less likely to detect errors. In additiona, we analyzed the impacts of the complexity of the information need, finding preliminary evidence that inappropriate reliance is worse for complex answers. We demonstrate how, through rigorous user evaluation, we can better develop systems that allow for effective and responsible human agency in veracity assessment processes.

82.0CVMar 26
Interpretable Zero-shot Referring Expression Comprehension with Query-driven Scene Graphs

Yike Wu, Necva Bolucu, Stephen Wan et al.

Zero-shot referring expression comprehension (REC) aims to locate target objects in images given natural language queries without relying on task-specific training data, demanding strong visual understanding capabilities. Existing Vision-Language Models~(VLMs), such as CLIP, commonly address zero-shot REC by directly measuring feature similarities between textual queries and image regions. However, these methods struggle to capture fine-grained visual details and understand complex object relationships. Meanwhile, Large Language Models~(LLMs) excel at high-level semantic reasoning, their inability to directly abstract visual features into textual semantics limits their application in REC tasks. To overcome these limitations, we propose \textbf{SGREC}, an interpretable zero-shot REC method leveraging query-driven scene graphs as structured intermediaries. Specifically, we first employ a VLM to construct a query-driven scene graph that explicitly encodes spatial relationships, descriptive captions, and object interactions relevant to the given query. By leveraging this scene graph, we bridge the gap between low-level image regions and higher-level semantic understanding required by LLMs. Finally, an LLM infers the target object from the structured textual representation provided by the scene graph, responding with detailed explanations for its decisions that ensure interpretability in the inference process. Extensive experiments show that SGREC achieves top-1 accuracy on most zero-shot REC benchmarks, including RefCOCO val (66.78\%), RefCOCO+ testB (53.43\%), and RefCOCOg val (73.28\%), highlighting its strong visual scene understanding.