Daniel Rutschmann

Ivor van der Hoog, Eva Rotenberg, Daniel Rutschmann

Let G be a weighted (directed) graph with n vertices and m edges. Given a source vertex s, Dijkstra's algorithm computes the shortest path lengths from s to all other vertices in O(m + n log n) time. This bound is known to be worst-case optimal via a reduction to sorting. Theoretical computer science has developed numerous fine-grained frameworks for analyzing algorithmic performance beyond standard worst-case analysis, such as instance optimality and output sensitivity. Haeupler et al. [FOCS '24] consider the notion of universal optimality, a refined complexity measure that accounts for both the graph topology and the edge weights. For a fixed graph topology, the universal running time of a weighted graph algorithm is defined as its worst-case running time over all possible edge weightings of G. An algorithm is universally optimal if no other algorithm achieves a better asymptotic universal running time on any particular graph topology. They show that Dijkstra's algorithm can be made universally optimal by replacing the heap with a custom data structure. We revisit their result. We introduce a simple heap property called timestamp optimality, where the cost of popping an element x is logarithmic in the number of elements inserted between pushing and popping x. We show that timestamp optimal heaps are not only easier to define but also easier to implement. Using these timestamps, we provide a significantly simpler proof that Dijkstra's algorithm, with the right kind of heap, is universally optimal.

Daniel Rutschmann

In 1972, Fredman proposes the problem of sorting under partial information: preprocess a directed acyclic graph $G$ with vertex set $X$ so that you can sort $X$ in $O(\log e(G))$ time, where $e(G)$ is the number of sorted orders compatible with $G$. Cardinal, Fiorini, Joret, Jungers and Munro [STOC'10] show that you can preprocess $G$ in $O(n^{2.5})$ time and then sort $X$ in $O(\log e(G) + n)$ time and $O(\log e(G))$ comparisons. Recent work of van der Hoog and Rutschmann [FOCS'24] implies an algorithm with $O(n^ω)$ preprocessing time where $ω< 2.372$ and $O(\log e(G))$ sorting time. Haeupler, Hladík, Iacono, Rozhoň, Tarjan and Tětek [SODA'25] achieve an overall running time of $O(\log e(G) + m)$. In this paper, we achieve tight bounds for this problem: $O(m)$ preprocessing time and $O(\log e(G))$ sorting time. As a key ingredient, we design a new fast heap data structure that might be of independent theoretical interest.

Sarita de Berg, Nynne Maria Foldager Bække, Frida Astrup Eriksen et al.

In the imprecise geometry model, the input is an imprecise point set, which is a family of regions $F = (R_1, \ldots,R_n)$, where for each $R_i$ one may retrieve the true point $p_i \in R_i$. By preprocessing $F$, we can construct the output, in our case the Pareto front, on $P$ faster. We efficiently construct the Pareto front of an imprecise point set in the plane. Efficiency is interpreted in two ways: minimizing (i) the number of retrievals, and (ii) the computation time used to determine the set of regions that must be retrieved and to construct the Pareto front. We present an algorithm to construct the Pareto front for possibly overlapping rectangles that is \emph{instance-optimal} with respect to the number of retrievals, meaning that for every fixed input $(F, P)$, there is no algorithm that retrieves asymptotically fewer regions to compute the output. This is a strong algorithmic quality, as it means that our algorithm is competitive even to clairvoyant algorithms which know a correct guess of the output and only have to verify its correctness. In terms of algorithmic running time, instance-optimality is provably unobtainable. We instead present an algorithm which is within a $\log n$-factor of instance-optimality. This generalizes earlier results to overlapping input regions, at only a minor cost in running time. For unit squares, we present an algorithm that is not only instance-optimal in the number of retrievals, but also \emph{universally} optimal in terms of running time, meaning that for any fixed set of regions $F$, no algorithm has a better worst-case running time for all possible point sets $P$. This is the first universally optimal algorithm for overlapping planar input. Compared to previous work, this result improves the degree of overlap, the preprocessing time, the number of retrievals, and the running time.

Ivor van der Hoog, John Iacono, Eva Rotenberg et al.

A heap is a dynamic data structure that stores a set of labeled values under the following operations: pop returns the minimum value of the heap, Push($x_i$) pushes a new value $x_i$ onto the heap, and DecreaseKey($i$, $v$) decreases the value $x_i$ to $v$. A working-set heap is a heap that supports the $x_i \gets$ pop$()$ operation in $O(\log Γ(x_i) )$ time where $Γ(x_i)$ is the size of the \emph{working set}: the number of elements that were pushed onto the heap while $x_i$ was in the heap. The goal of working set heap design is to maintain the working set property while minimizing the overhead of the Push and DecreaseKey operations. On a word RAM, there exist working set heaps that support Push and DecreaseKey in amortized constant time. In this paper, we show via a simple construction that pointer machines, one of the most general and least-assuming computational models, support working set heaps that support Push in amortized constant time and DecreaseKey in inverse-Ackermann time. A by-product of this analysis is that Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm can be near-universally optimal on a pointer machine -- incurring only an additive $O(m \, α(m))$ overhead compared to the optimal running time for distance ordering, where $m$ denotes the number of edges in the graph.