William Layton

NA
10papers
187citations
Novelty42%
AI Score42

10 Papers

NADec 1, 2017
Robust and Efficient Modular Grad-Div Stabilization

Joseph Anthony Fiordilino, William Layton, Yao Rong

This paper presents two modular grad-div algorithms for calculating solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE). These algorithms add to an NSE code a minimally intrusive module that implements grad-div stabilization. The algorithms do not suffer from either breakdown (locking) or debilitating slow down for large values of grad-div parameters. Stability and optimal-order convergence of the methods are proven. Numerical tests confirm the theory and illustrate the benefits of these algorithms over a fully coupled grad-div stabilization.

NAFeb 25, 2019
An Artificial Compression Reduced Order Model

Victor DeCaria, Traian Iliescu, William Layton et al.

We propose a novel artificial compression, reduced order model (AC-ROM) for the numerical simulation of viscous incompressible fluid flows. The new AC-ROM provides approximations not only for velocity, but also for pressure, which is needed to calculate forces on bodies in the flow and to connect the simulation parameters with pressure data. The new AC-ROM does not require that the velocity-pressure ROM spaces satisfy the inf-sup (Ladyzhenskaya-Babuska-Brezzi) condition and its basis functions are constructed from data that are not required to be weakly-divergence free. We prove error estimates for the reduced basis discretization of the AC-ROM. We also investigate numerically the new AC-ROM in the simulation of a two-dimensional flow between offset cylinders.

NAMar 4, 2015
Algorithms and Models for Turbulence Not at Statistical Equilibrium

Nan Jiang, William Layton

Standard eddy viscosity models, while robust, cannot represent backscatter and have severe difficulties with complex turbulence not at statistical equilibrium. This report gives a new derivation of eddy viscosity models from an equation for the evolution of variance in a turbulent flow. The new derivation also shows how to correct eddy viscosity models. The report proves the corrected models preserve important features of the true Reynolds stresses. It gives algorithms for their discretization including a minimally invasive modular step to adapt an eddy viscosity code to the extended models. A numerical test is given with the usual and over diffusive Smagorinsky model. The correction (scaled by $10^{-8}$ ) does successfully exhibit intermittent backscatter.

NAJan 25, 2016
Energy Dissipation in the Smagorinsky Model of Turbulence

William Layton

The Smagorinsky model, unmodified, is often reported to severely overdiffuse flows. Previous estimates of the energy dissipation rate of the Smagorinsky model for shear flows reflect a blow up of model energy dissipation as Re increases. This blow up is consistent with the numerical evidence and leads to the question: Is the over dissipation due to the influence of the turbulent viscosity in boundary layers alone or is its action on small scales generated by the nonlinearity through the cascade also a contributor? This report develops model dissipation estimates for body force driven flow under periodic boundary conditions (and thus only with nonlinearity generated small scales). It is proven that the model's time averaged energy dissipation rate satisfies the same upper bound as for the NSE plus one additional term that vanishes uniformly in the Reynolds number as the Smagorinsky length scale decreases. Since this estimate is consistent with that observed for the NSE, it establishes that, without boundary layers, the Smagorinsky model does not over dissipate.

NAJan 31, 2019
A time-accurate, adaptive discretization for fluid flow problems

Victor DeCaria, William Layton, Haiyun Zhao

This report presents a low computational and cognitive complexity, stable, time accurate and adaptive method for the Navier-Stokes equations. The improved method requires a minimally intrusive modification to an existing program based on the fully implicit / backward Euler time discretization, does not add to the computational complexity, and is conceptually simple. The backward Euler approximation is simply post-processed with a two-step, linear time filter. The time filter additionally removes the overdamping of Backward Euler while remaining unconditionally energy stable, proven herein. Even for constant stepsizes, the method does not reduce to a standard / named time stepping method but is related to a known 2-parameter family of A-stable, two step, second order methods. Numerical tests confirm the predicted convergence rates and the improved predictions of flow quantities such as drag and lift.

99.9NAMar 30
Energy dissipation rates of ensemble eddy viscosity models of turbulence: the periodic box

William Layton, Nanda Nechingal Raghunathan

Classical eddy viscosity models of turbulence add an eddy viscosity term based on the Kolmogorov-Prandtl parameterization by a turbulent length scale $l$ and a turbulent kinetic energy $k^{\prime }$. Approximations of the unknowns $l,k^{\prime }$ are typically constructed by solving multi-parameter systems of nonlinear convection-diffusion-reaction equations. Often these over-diffuse so additional fixes are added. Alternately, one can solve an ensemble of NSE's with perturbed data and simply compute directly $k^{\prime }$(without modeling). The question then arises: Does this ensemble eddy viscosity approach over-diffuse solutions? We prove herein that for turbulence in a periodic box it does not.

99.2NAMar 11
On the energy dissipation rate of ensemble eddy viscosity models of turbulence: Shear flows

William Layton

Classical eddy viscosity models add a viscosity term with turbulent viscosity coefficient developed beginning with the Kolmogorov-Prandtl parameterization. Approximations of unknown accuracy of the unknown mixing lengths and turbulent kinetic energy are typically constructed by solving associated systems of nonlinear convection-diffusion-reaction equations with nonlinear boundary conditions. Often these over-diffuse so additional fixes are added such as wall laws or using different approximations in different regions (which must also be specified). Alternately, one can solve an ensemble of NSE's with perturbed data, compute the ensemble mean and fluctuation and simply compute directly the turbulent viscosity parameterization. This idea is recent, seems to be of lower complexity and greater accuracy and produces parameterizations with the correct near wall asymptotic behavior. The question then arises: Does this ensemble eddy viscosity approach over-diffuse solutions? This question is addressed herein.

NAOct 15, 2018
A new embedded variable stepsize, variable order family of low computational complexity

Victor DeCaria, Ahmet Guzel, William Layton et al.

Variable Stepsize Variable Order (VSVO) methods are the methods of choice to efficiently solve a wide range of ODEs with minimal work and assured accuracy. However, VSVO methods have limited impact in timestepping methods in complex applications due to their computational complexity and the difficulty to implement them in legacy code. We introduce a family of implicit, embedded, VSVO methods that require only one BDF solve at each time step followed by adding linear combinations of the solution at previous time levels. In particular, we construct implicit and linearly implicit VSVO methods of orders two, three and four with the same computational complexity as variable stepsize BDF3. The choice of changing the order of the method is simple and does not require additional solves of linear or nonlinear systems.

NASep 25, 2018
Analysis of variable-step/non-autonomous artificial compression methods

Robin Ming Chen, William Layton, Michael McLaughlin

A standard artificial compression (AC) method for incompressible flow is $$ \frac{u_{n+1}^{\varepsilon }-u_{n}^{\varepsilon }}{k}+u_{n+1}^{\varepsilon }\cdot \nabla u_{n+1}^{\varepsilon }+{\frac{1}{2}}u_{n+1}^{\varepsilon }\nabla \cdot u_{n+1}^{\varepsilon }+\nabla p_{n+1}^{\varepsilon }-νΔu_{n+1}^{\varepsilon }=f\text{ ,} \\ \varepsilon \frac{p_{n+1}^{\varepsilon }-p_{n}^{\varepsilon }}{k} +\nabla \cdot u_{n+1}^{\varepsilon }=0 $$ for, typically, $\varepsilon =k$ (timestep). It is fast, efficient and stable with accuracy $O(\varepsilon +k)$. For adaptive (and thus variable) timestep $k_{n}$ (and thus $\varepsilon =\varepsilon _{n}$) its long time stability is unknown. For variable $k,\varepsilon $ this report shows how to adapt a standard AC method to recover a provably stable method. For the associated continuum AC model, we prove convergence of the $\varepsilon =\varepsilon (t)$\ artificial compression model to a weak solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations as $\varepsilon =\varepsilon (t)\rightarrow 0$. The analysis is based on space-time Strichartz estimates for a non-autonomous acoustic equation. Variable $\varepsilon ,k$ numerical tests in $2d$ and $3d$ are given for the new AC method.

NAAug 21, 2017
Analysis of the effect of Time Filters on the implicit method: increased accuracy and improved stability

Ahmet Guzel, William Layton

This report considers linear multistep methods through time filtering. The approach has several advantages. It is modular and requires the addition of only one line of additional code. Error estimation and variable timesteps is straightforward and the individual effect of each step\ is conceptually clear. We present its development for the backward Euler method and a curvature reducing time filter leading to a 2-step, strongly A-stable, second order linear multistep method.