Marcin Pilipczuk

Maria Chudnovsky, Jadwiga Czyżewska, Kacper Kluk et al.

Many natural computational problems, including e.g. Max Weight Independent Set, Feedback Vertex Set, or Vertex Planarization, can be unified under an umbrella of finding the largest sparse induced subgraph, that satisfies some property definable in CMSO$_2$ logic. It is believed that each problem expressible with this formalism can be solved in polynomial time in graphs that exclude a fixed path as an induced subgraph. This belief is supported by the existence of a quasipolynomial-time algorithm by Gartland, Lokshtanov, Pilipczuk, Pilipczuk, and Rzążewski [STOC 2021], and a recent polynomial-time algorithm for $P_6$-free graphs by Chudnovsky, McCarty, Pilipczuk, Pilipczuk, and Rzążewski [SODA 2024]. In this work we extend polynomial-time tractability of all such problems to $P_7$-free graphs of bounded clique number.

Édouard Bonnet, Hung Le, Marcin Pilipczuk et al.

Fat minors are a coarse analogue of graph minors where the subgraphs modeling vertices and edges of the embedded graph are required to be distant from each other, instead of just being disjoint. In this paper, we give a coarse analogue of the classic theorem that an $n$-vertex graph excluding a fixed minor admits a balanced separator of size $O(\sqrt{n})$. Specifically, we prove that for every integer $d$, real $\varepsilon>0$, and graph $H$, there exist constants $c$ and $r$ such that every $n$-vertex graph $G$ excluding $H$ as a $d$-fat minor admits a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ that is a balanced separator of $G$ and can be covered by $c n^{\frac{1}{2}+\varepsilon}$ balls of radius $r$ in $G$. Our proof also works in the weighted setting where the balance of the separator is measured with respect to any weight function on the vertices, and is effective: we obtain a randomized polynomial-time algorithm to compute either such a balanced separator, or a $d$-fat model of $H$ in $G$.

Kacper Kluk, Hung Le, Wojciech Nadara et al.

A furthest neighbor data structure on a metric space $(V,\mathrm{dist})$ and a set $P \subseteq V$ answers the following query: given $v \in V$, output $p \in P$ maximizing $\mathrm{dist}(v,p)$; in the approximate version, it is allowed to report any $p \in P$ with $\mathrm{dist}(v,p) \geq (1-\varepsilon)\max_{p' \in P} \mathrm{dist}(v,p')$ for an accuracy parameter $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$. A particular type of approximate furthest neighbor data structure is an $\varepsilon$-coreset: a small subset $Q \subseteq P$ such that for every query $v \in V$ there is a feasible answer $p \in Q$. Our main result is that in planar metrics there always exists an $\varepsilon$-coreset for furthest neighbors of size bounded polynomially in $(1/\varepsilon)$. This improves upon an exponential bound of Bourneuf and Pilipczuk [SODA'25] and resolves an open problem of de Berg and Theocharous [SoCG'24] for the case of polygons with holes. On the technical side, we develop a connection between $\varepsilon$-coreset for furthest neighbors and an invariant of a metric space that we call an $\varepsilon$-comatching index -- a sibling of $\varepsilon$-(semi-)ladder index, a.k.a, $\varepsilon$-scatter dimension, as defined by Abbasi et al [FOCS'23]. While the $\varepsilon$-(semi-)ladder index of planar metrics admits an exponential lower bound, we show that the $\varepsilon$-comatching index of planar metrics is polynomial, all in $1/\varepsilon$. The exponential separation between $\varepsilon$-(semi-)ladder and $\varepsilon$-comatching is rather surprising, and the proof is the main technical contribution of our work.

Dániel Marx, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michał Pilipczuk

Given an $H$-minor-free graph $G$ and an integer $k$, our main technical contribution is sampling in randomized polynomial time an induced subgraph $G'$ of $G$ and a tree decomposition of $G'$ of width $\widetilde{O}(k)$ such that for every $Z\subseteq V(G)$ of size $k$, with probability at least $\left(2^{\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{k})}|V(G)|^{O(1)}\right)^{-1}$, we have $Z \subseteq V(G')$ and every bag of the tree decomposition contains at most $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{k})$ vertices of $Z$. Having such a tree decomposition allows us to solve a wide range of problems in (randomized) time $2^{\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{k})}n^{O(1)}$ where the solution is a pattern $Z$ of size $k$, e.g., Directed $k$-Path, $H$-Packing, etc. In particular, our result recovers all the algorithmic applications of the pattern-covering result of Fomin et al. [SIAM J. Computing 2022] (which requires the pattern to be connected) and the planar subgraph-finding algorithms of Nederlof [STOC 2020]. Furthermore, for $K_{h,3}$-free graphs (which include bounded-genus graphs) and for a fixed constant $d$, we signficantly strengthen the result by ensuring that not only $Z$ has intersection $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{k})$ with each bag, but even the distance-$d$ neighborhood $N^d_{G}[Z]$ as well. This extension makes it possible to handle a wider range of problems where the neighborhood of the pattern also plays a role in the solution, such as partial domination problems and problems involving distance constraints.

Stefan Kratsch, Tomáš Masařík, Irene Muzi et al.

Given two disjoint sets $W_1$ and $W_2$ of points in the plane, the Optimal Discretization problem asks for the minimum size of a family of horizontal and vertical lines that separate $W_1$ from $W_2$, that is, in every region into which the lines partition the plane there are either only points of $W_1$, or only points of $W_2$, or the region is empty. Equivalently, Optimal Discretization can be phrased as a task of discretizing continuous variables: we would like to discretize the range of $x$-coordinates and the range of $y$-coordinates into as few segments as possible, maintaining that no pair of points from $W_1 \times W_2$ are projected onto the same pair of segments under this discretization. We provide a fixed-parameter algorithm for the problem, parameterized by the number of lines in the solution. Our algorithm works in time $2^{O(k^2 \log k)} n^{O(1)}$, where $k$ is the bound on the number of lines to find and $n$ is the number of points in the input. Our result answers in positive a question of Bonnet, Giannopolous, and Lampis [IPEC 2017] and of Froese (PhD thesis, 2018) and is in contrast with the known intractability of two closely related generalizations: the Rectangle Stabbing problem and the generalization in which the selected lines are not required to be axis-parallel.

Lars Jaffke, Paloma T. Lima, Tomáš Masařík et al.

We study a generalization of the classic Global Min-Cut problem, called Global Label Min-Cut (or sometimes Global Hedge Min-Cut): the edges of the input (multi)graph are labeled (or partitioned into color classes or hedges), and removing all edges of the same label (color or from the same hedge) costs one. The problem asks to disconnect the graph at minimum cost. While the $st$-cut version of the problem is known to be NP-hard, the above global cut version is known to admit a quasi-polynomial randomized $n^{O(\log \mathrm{OPT})}$-time algorithm due to Ghaffari, Karger, and Panigrahi [SODA 2017]. They consider this as ``strong evidence that this problem is in P''. We show that this is actually not the case. We complete the study of the complexity of the Global Label Min-Cut problem by showing that the quasi-polynomial running time is probably optimal: We show that the existence of an algorithm with running time $(np)^{o(\log n/ (\log \log n)^2)}$ would contradict the Exponential Time Hypothesis, where $n$ is the number of vertices, and $p$ is the number of labels in the input. The key step for the lower bound is a proof that Global Label Min-Cut is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the number of uncut labels. In other words, the problem is difficult in the regime where almost all labels need to be cut to disconnect the graph. To turn this lower bound into a quasi-polynomial-time lower bound, we also needed to revisit the framework due to Marx [Theory Comput. 2010] of proving lower bounds assuming Exponential Time Hypothesis through the Subgraph Isomorphism problem parameterized by the number of edges of the pattern. Here, we provide an alternative simplified proof of the hardness of this problem that is more versatile with respect to the choice of the regimes of the parameters.