Kehao Zhuang

Kehao Zhuang, Huanhai Xin, Verena Häberle et al.

Grid-forming (GFM) technology is widely regarded as a promising solution for future power systems dominated by power electronics. However, a universally accepted definition of GFM behavior and precise method for its quantification remain elusive. Moreover, the impact of GFM converter on system stability is not precisely quantified, creating a significant disconnect between device and system levels. To address these gaps from a small-signal perspective, at the device level, the paper introduces a novel metric, the Forming Index (FI) to quantify a converter's response to grid voltage fluctuations. Rather than enumerating various control architectures, the FI provides a metric for the converter's GFM ability by quantifying its sensitivity to grid variations. At the system level, a new quantitative measure of system strength that captures the multi-bus voltage stiffness is proposed, which quantifies the voltage and phase angle responses of multiple buses to current or power disturbances. The paper further extends and defines this concept to grid strength and bus strength to identify weak areas within the system. Finally, the device and system levels are bridged by formally proving that GFM converters enhance system strength. The proposed framework provides a unified benchmark for GFM converter design, optimal placement, and system stability assessment.

Kehao Zhuang, Huanhai Xin, Verena Häberle et al.

Grid-forming (GFM) technology is widely regarded as a promising solution for future power systems dominated by power electronics. However, a precise method for quantifying GFM converter behavior and a universally accepted GFM definition remain elusive. Moreover, the impact of GFM on system stability is not precisely quantified, creating a significant disconnect between device and system levels. To address these gaps from a small-signal perspective, at the device level, we introduce a novel metric, the Forming Index (FI) to quantify a converter's response to grid voltage fluctuations. Rather than enumerating various control architectures, the FI provides a metric for the converter's GFM ability by quantifying its sensitivity to grid variations. At the system level, we propose a new quantitative measure of system strength that captures the multi-bus voltage stiffness, which quantifies the voltage and phase angle responses of multiple buses to current or power disturbances. We further extend and define this concept to grid strength and bus strength to identify weak areas within the system. Finally, we bridge the device and system levels by formally proving that GFM converters enhance system strength. Our proposed framework provides a unified benchmark for GFM converter design, optimal placement, and system stability assessment.

Yifei Wang, Han Wang, Kehao Zhuang et al.

The integration of converter-interfaced generation introduces new transient stability challenges to modern power systems. Classical Lyapunov- and scalable passivity-based approaches typically rely on restrictive assumptions, and finding storage functions for large grids is generally considered intractable. Furthermore, most methods require an accurate grid dynamics model. To address these challenges, we propose a model-free, nonlinear, and dissipativity-based controller which, when applied to grid-connected virtual synchronous generators (VSGs), enhances power system transient stability. Using input-state data, we train neural networks to learn dissipativity-characterizing matrices that yield stabilizing controllers. Furthermore, we incorporate cost function shaping to improve the performance with respect to the user-specified objectives. Numerical results on a modified, all-VSG Kundur two-area power system validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Verena Häberle, Kehao Zhuang, Xiuqiang He et al.

This paper introduces a conceptual foundation for Next Generation Grid Codes (NGGCs) based on stability and performance certificates, enabling the provision of dynamic ancillary services such as fast frequency and voltage regulation through decentralized frequency-domain criteria. The NGGC framework offers two key benefits: (i) rigorous closed-loop stability guarantees, and (ii) explicit performance guarantees for frequency and voltage dynamics in power systems. Regarding (i) stability, we employ loop-shifting and passivity-based techniques to derive local frequency-domain stability certificates for individual device dynamics. These certificates ensure the closed-loop stability of the entire interconnected power system through fully decentralized verification. Concerning (ii) performance, we establish quantitative bounds on critical time-domain indicators of system dynamics, including the average-mode frequency and voltage nadirs, the rate-of-change-of-frequency (RoCoF), steady-state deviations, and oscillation damping capabilities. The bounds are obtained by expressing the performance metrics as frequency-domain conditions on local device behavior. The NGGC framework is non-parametric, model-agnostic, and accommodates arbitrary device dynamics under mild assumptions. It thus provides a unified, decentralized approach to certifying both stability and performance without requiring explicit device-model parameterizations. Moreover, the NGGC framework can be directly used as a set of specifications for control design, offering a principled foundation for future stability- and performance-oriented grid codes in power systems.