Dirk Van Hertem

Ali Jalilian, Deepjyoti Deka, Md. Umar Hashmi et al.

Dynamic operating envelopes (DOEs) provide a systematic framework to integrate the flexibility of distribution grid resources while safeguarding network limits such as line ratings and voltage bounds. However, the flexibility derived from individual DOEs is often restricted and conservative, especially when some resources can coordinate via communication with an aggregator. This paper presents a convex, geometry-aware framework for constructing DOE for distribution grid customers under partial coordination, with coordinated customers modeled through polytopal flexibility sets and non-coordinated customers through hyperrectangles. The framework additionally incorporates fairness constraints for export and import headroom allocated to the customers within the DOE design. To account for forecast uncertainty in inelastic injections, the DOE design is extended to a robust formulation for bounded uncertainty sets. Case studies on the European Low Voltage Test Feeder indicate that the proposed DOE construction expands total harnessed flexibility, while being consistent with network limits, export/import fairness constraints and is robust to forecast uncertainty. Specifically, coordinating 30% of customers increased the achievable aggregate active-power injection range by approximately 25% relative to the non-coordinated baseline.

Alexandre M. V. Gouveia, Md. Umar Hashmi, Reinhilde D'hulst et al.

The increasing penetration of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs), particularly electric vehicles, heat pumps, and photovoltaic systems, is fundamentally changing power flows in Low-Voltage (LV) distribution networks. Despite this transition, Distribution System Operators (DSOs) often lack reliable and up-to-date knowledge of the DER capacity connected downstream of LV substations. Limited observability, incomplete topology information, and restricted access to customer-level data make it difficult to maintain accurate DER registries, creating uncertainty in both operational and planning processes. This paper presents aggregated DER installed capacity, estimated at LV aggregation points, as a practical and scalable approach to improving DER awareness without requiring customer-level monitoring. We define the problem of estimating DER installed capacities from commonly available substation and feeder measurements. By linking these estimates to operational and planning needs, we discuss how knowledge of aggregated DER installed capacity enhances DER-aware forecasting, congestion management, flexibility quantification, hosting capacity assessment, and monitoring of DER adoption.

Giacomo Bastianel, Dirk Van Hertem, Hakan Ergun et al.

Rising electricity demand and the growing integration of renewables are intensifying congestion in transmission grids. Grid topology optimization through busbar splitting (BuS) and optimal transmission switching can alleviate grid congestion and reduce the generation costs in a power system. However, BuS optimization requires a large number of binary variables, and analyzing all the substations for potential new topological actions is computationally intractable, particularly in large grids. To tackle this issue, we propose a set of metrics to identify and rank promising candidates for BuS, focusing on finding buses where topology optimization can reduce generation costs. To assess the effect of BuS on the identified buses, we use a combined mixed-integer convex-quadratic BuS model to compute the optimal topology and test it with the non-linear non-convex AC optimal power flow (OPF) simulation to show its AC feasibility. By testing and validating the proposed metrics on test cases of different sizes, we show that they are able to identify busbars that reduce the total generation costs when their topology is optimized. Thus, the metrics enable effective selection of busbars for BuS, with no need to test every busbar in the grid, one at a time.

Abolfazl Mohammadi, Merijn Van Deyck, Geraint Chaffey et al.

Protection system design for multi-terminal HVDC grids is challenging due to the complexity of the system and the often conflicting design requirements. Effective specification of protection component parameters (e.g., DC circuit breakers and series DC inductors) during component-level design is crucial due to interdependencies among components, the need for detailed modeling, and the complex interactions between the protection system and converter control systems. Both analytical and simulation-based approaches have been proposed as solutions for component-level design. However, analytical methods may not accurately represent system behavior given that approximation is necessary, and simulation-based approaches often require extensive computational effort and time. Therefore, this paper presents an efficient systematic design method, combining both approaches. First, a fundamental analytical solution is derived to consider the protection system requirements. Then, a hybrid analytical--EMT methodology is proposed to accelerate convergence toward the required design parameters, after which detailed models are applied to ensure accuracy in design and validation. The approach is applicable to component-level design for both fully and partially selective protection strategies in HVDC grids.

Pedro F. C. de Carvalho, Zijie Liu, Md Umar Hashmi et al.

The incorporation of fairness into the distribution network (DN) planning and operation has become a key goal of recent studies. The cost of implementing fairness, denominated the price of fairness (PoF), covers the efficiency that is renounced for attaining social cohesion through fair outcomes. Locational disparity makes fairness schemes emerge to level the consumers playing field. However, fairness encompasses a range of notions. From egalitarian to merit-based criteria, various metrics are implemented as a tool for measuring equitable utility distribution. These have different mathematical complexities, from linear to non-linear programming cases, which affect their overall applicability. Hence, this study compiles the overarching fairness notions and metrics, reviewing how these affect stakeholders and the inherent mathematical optimisation in resource allocation problems. The aim is to support consistent and transparent planning and decision-making within DN operations.