Thomas N. Robinson

Christopher A. Kelly, Yikun Chi, Nicholas Haber et al.

The relationship between digital media use and mental health remains poorly understood, in part because real-world digital behavior is rarely captured at scale. This intensive longitudinal study tracked participants' complete natural smartphone interactions over one year. We collected screenshots every 5 seconds from 145 adults (yielding 111 million screenshots), alongside biweekly assessments of anxiety and depression (mean = 24 surveys). The valence and arousal of each screenshot were assessed using a deep learning affect model. Individuals showed highly idiosyncratic media patterns, with substantially more variance in anxiety and depression accounted for within-person than between-person. Day-to-day fluctuations in the valence and arousal of a person's screen content predicted subsequent changes in depression and anxiety, whereas between-person differences did not. Specifically, greater exposure to low-arousal negative content was associated with higher depression and anxiety. These findings underscore the dynamic, idiosyncratic nature of digital consumption and the need for targeted measurement and intervention.

Merve Cerit, Andrea Mock, Vryan Almanon Feliciano et al.

Predicting whether an individual's depressive symptoms will worsen, remain stable, or improve over the coming weeks can enable earlier and more targeted care, yet prospective within-person trajectory prediction remains largely unaddressed in digital phenotyping. We combine fortnightly CES-D assessments with over 100 million screenshots captured every five seconds via the Stanford Screenomics platform from 96 adults followed for approximately one year (M = 20.9, SD = 3.9 assessments per participant, 2,002 total observations). We frame prediction as a within-person classification task: whether symptoms will worsen, remain stable, or improve over the subsequent fortnight, operationalized in three ways to capture clinically meaningful change. Under temporal holdout, XGBoost achieves an AUC of 0.906 for crossings of established CES-D severity bands and 0.755 for change relative to each participant's own within-person variability, generalizing to unseen individuals (AUC = 0.821). Each person's typical symptom level was the only statistically significant predictor above the most recent CES-D score; without it, the most consequential worsening transitions go undetected. Screenome-derived behavioral features revealed prodromal patterns of worsening, including escalating social media use, fragmented device engagement, and changes in overnight activity, with substantial individual heterogeneity. These findings establish a proof-of-concept foundation for monitoring systems that could identify individuals approaching clinical deterioration before symptoms reach a crisis point.