Devansh R. Agrawal

RO
3papers
2citations
Novelty62%
AI Score46

3 Papers

ROMay 24
A Formal gatekeeper Framework for Safe Dual Control with Active Exploration

Kaleb Ben Naveed, Devansh R. Agrawal, Dimitra Panagou

Planning safe trajectories under model uncertainty is a fundamental challenge. Robust planning ensures safety by considering worst-case realizations, yet ignores uncertainty reduction and leads to overly conservative behavior. Actively reducing uncertainty on-the-fly during a nominal mission defines the dual control problem. Most approaches address this by adding a weighted exploration term to the cost, tuned to trade off the nominal objective and uncertainty reduction, but without formal consideration of when exploration is beneficial. Moreover, safety is enforced in some methods but not in others. We propose a framework that integrates robust planning with active exploration under formal guarantees as follows: The key innovation and contribution is that exploration is pursued only when it provides a verifiable improvement without compromising safety. To achieve this, we utilize our earlier work on gatekeeper as an architecture for safety verification, and extend it so that it generates both safe and informative trajectories that reduce uncertainty and the cost of the mission, or keep it within a user-defined budget. The methodology is evaluated via simulation case studies on the online dual control of a quadrotor under parametric uncertainty.

ROApr 16
Trajectory Planning for Safe Dual Control with Active Exploration

Kaleb Ben Naveed, Manveer Singh, Devansh R. Agrawal et al.

Planning safe trajectories under model uncertainty is a fundamental challenge. Robust planning ensures safety by considering worst-case realizations, yet ignores uncertainty reduction and leads to overly conservative behavior. Actively reducing uncertainty on-the-fly during a nominal mission defines the dual control problem. Most approaches address this by adding a weighted exploration term to the cost, tuned to trade off the nominal objective and uncertainty reduction, but without formal consideration of when exploration is beneficial. Moreover, safety is enforced in some methods but not in others. We study a budget-constrained dual control problem, where uncertainty is reduced subject to safety and a mission-level cost budget that limits the allowable degradation in task performance due to exploration. In this work, we propose Dual-gatekeeper, a framework that integrates robust planning with active exploration under formal guarantees of safety and budget feasibility. The key idea is that exploration is pursued only when it provides a verifiable improvement without compromising safety or violating the budget, enabling the system to balance immediate task performance with long-term uncertainty reduction in a principled manner. We provide two implementations of the framework based on different safety mechanisms and demonstrate its performance on quadrotor navigation and autonomous car racing case studies under parametric uncertainty.

MAMar 15
R3R: Decentralized Multi-Agent Collision Avoidance with Infinite-Horizon Safety

Thomas Marshall Vielmetti, Devansh R. Agrawal, Dimitra Panagou

Existing decentralized methods for multi-agent motion planning lack formal, infinite-horizon safety guarantees, especially for communication-constrained systems. We present R3R which, to our knowledge, is the first decentralized and asynchronous framework for multi-agent motion planning under range-limited communication constraints with infinite-horizon safety guarantees for systems of nonlinear agents. R3R's novelty lies in combining our gatekeeper safety framework with a geometric constraint termed R-Boundedness, which together establish a formal link between an agent's communication radius and its ability to plan safely. We constrain trajectories to lie within a fixed planning radius, determined by a function of the agent's communication radius. This enables trajectories to be certified as provably safe for all time using only local information. Our algorithm is fully asynchronous, and ensures the forward invariance of these guarantees even in time-varying networks where agents asynchronously join and replan. We evaluate our approach in simulations of up to 128 Dubins vehicles, validating our theoretical safety guarantees in dense, obstacle-rich scenarios. We further show that R3R's computational complexity scales with local agent density rather than problem size, providing a practical solution for scalable and provably safe multi-agent systems.