Jayalal Sarma

Chandrima Kayal, Rajat Mittal, Sai Soumya Nalli et al.

For any Boolean function $f:\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ with a complexity measure having value $k \ll n$, is it possible to restrict the function $f$ to $Θ(k)$ variables while keeping the complexity preserved at $Θ(k)$? This question, in the context of query complexity, was recently studied by G{ö}{ö}s, Newman, Riazanov and Sokolov (STOC 2024). They showed, among other results, that query complexity can not be condensed losslessly. They asked if complexity measures like block sensitivity or unambiguous certificate complexity can be condensed losslessly? In this work, we show that decision tree measures like block sensitivity and certificate complexity, cannot be condensed losslessly. That is, there exists a Boolean function $f$ such that any restriction of $f$ to $O(\mathcal{M}(f))$ variables has $\mathcal{M}(\cdot)$-complexity at most $\tilde{O}(\mathcal{M}(f)^{2/3})$, where $\mathcal{M} \in \{\mathsf{bs},\mathsf{fbs},\mathsf{C},\mathsf{D}\}$. This also improves upon a result of G{ö}{ö}s, Newman, Riazanov and Sokolov (STOC 2024). We also complement the negative results on lossless condensation with positive results about lossy condensation. In particular, we show that for every Boolean function $f$ there exists a restriction of $f$ to $O(\mathcal{M}(f))$ variables such that its $\mathcal{M}(\cdot)$-complexity is at least $Ω(\mathcal{M}(f)^{1/2})$, where $\mathcal{M} \in \{\mathsf{bs},\mathsf{fbs},\mathsf{C},\mathsf{UC}_{min},\mathsf{UC}_1,\mathsf{UC},\mathsf{D},\widetilde{\mathsf{deg}},λ\}$. We also show a slightly weaker positive result for randomized and quantum query complexity.

Sutanay Bhattacharjee, Ameya Panse, Jayalal Sarma

Color refinement is an important technique that works very well in practice for the graph isomorphism problem. Tinhofer graphs are the class of graphs for which refinement together with individualization correctly tests graph isomorphism against every other graph, irrespective of the choices of vertices made during individualization. Motivated by the fact that Tinhofer graphs form a natural boundary for efficient graph isomorphism tests based on color refinement, in this paper, we introduce a hierarchy of graph classes within the class of Tinhofer graphs. We call a graph $G$ $k$-Tinhofer if, after $k$ rounds of individualization and refinement, the resulting colored graphs remain isomorphic for every graph $H \cong G$, irrespective of the choices of vertices made during individualization. Arvind et al. (2017) studied a hierarchy of graph classes motivated by color refinement - discrete, amenable, Tinhofer, and refinable graphs. We show that the $k$-Tinhofer hierarchy lies between the class of all graphs and Tinhofer graphs, with refinable graphs coinciding with the first level of the hierarchy. We obtain two characterizations of $k$-Tinhofer graphs: an algebraic characterization in terms of orbit partitions induced by pointwise stabilizers of automorphism groups, and a combinatorial characterization in terms of individualization-refinement trees and quotient graphs. For every fixed integer $k \ge 0$, there exist vertex-colored graphs that are $k$-Tinhofer but not $(k + 1)$-Tinhofer. For every fixed integer $k \ge 0$, the problem of deciding whether a given $k$-Tinhofer graph is ($k + 1$)-Tinhofer is $P$-hard under uniform $\mathsf{AC^0}$ many-one reductions. We show that testing isomorphism between an $(n - k)$-Tinhofer graph $G$ and an arbitrary graph $H$ is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the parameter $k$.

Sai Soumya Nalli, Karthikeya Polisetty, Jayalal Sarma

Given an $n$-bit Boolean function with a complexity measure (such as block sensitivity, query complexity, etc.) $M(f) = k$, the hardness condensation question asks whether $f$ can be restricted to $O(k)$ variables such that the complexity measure is $Ω(k)$? In this work, we study the condensability of block sensitivity, certificate complexity, AND (and OR) query complexity and Fourier sparsity. We show that block sensitivity does not condense under restrictions, unlike sensitivity: there exists a Boolean function $f$ with query complexity $k$ such that any restriction of $f$ to $O(k)$ variables has block sensitivity $O(k^{\frac{2}{3}})$. This answers an open question in Göös, Newman, Riazanov, and Sokolov (2024) in the negative. The same function yields an analogous incondensable result for certificate complexity. We further show that $\mathsf{AND}$(and $\mathsf{OR}$) decision trees are also incondensable.

Anoop S. K. M., Jayalal Sarma

Computing the rotation distance between two binary trees with $n$ internal nodes efficiently (in $poly(n)$ time) is a long standing open question in the study of height balancing in tree data structures. In this paper, we initiate the study of this problem bounding the rank of the trees given at the input (defined by Ehrenfeucht and Haussler (1989) in the context of decision trees). We define the rank-bounded rotation distance between two given binary trees $T_1$ and $T_2$ (with $n$ internal nodes) of rank at most $r$, denoted by $d_r(T_1,T_2)$, as the length of the shortest sequence of rotations that transforms $T_1$ to $T_2$ with the restriction that the intermediate trees must be of rank at most $r$. We show that the rotation distance problem reduces in polynomial time to the rank bounded rotation distance problem. This motivates the study of the problem in the combinatorial and algorithmic frontiers. Observing that trees with rank $1$ coincide exactly with skew trees (binary trees where every internal node has at least one leaf as a child), we show the following results in this frontier : We present an $O(n^2)$ time algorithm for computing $d_1(T_1,T_2)$. That is, when the given trees are skew trees (we call this variant as skew rotation distance problem) - where the intermediate trees are restricted to be skew as well. In particular, our techniques imply that for any two skew trees $d(T_1,T_2) \le n^2$. We show the following upper bound : for any two trees $T_1$ and $T_2$ of rank at most $r_1$ and $r_2$ respectively, we have that: $d_r(T_1,T_2) \le n^2 (1+(2n+1)(r_1+r_2-2))$ where $r = max\{r_1,r_2\}$. This bound is asymptotically tight for $r=1$. En route our proof of the above theorems, we associate binary trees to permutations and bivariate polynomials, and prove several characterizations in the case of skew trees.

Balagopal Komarath, Harshil Mittal, Jayalal Sarma

Arithmetic circuit complexity studies the complexity of computing polynomials using only arithmetic operations such as addition, multiplication, subtraction, and division. Polynomials over rings of integers model counting problems. Similarly, polynomials over semirings such as tropical semirings model optimization problems. Circuits over semirings then model so called pure algorithms, algorithms that only use the operations in the semiring. In this paper, we do a complexity-theoretic study of the power and limitations of circuits (which represent dynamic programs) over semirings: i) We define $\mathsf{VNP}$ over min-plus semirings, which can faithfully represent problems such as computing min-weight perfect matchings and min-weight Hamiltonian cycles where we have efficiently verifiable certificates. Unlike over rings, we complement the values in the certificate for free as complementation is impossible over min-plus semirings. We prove a dichotomy theorem that states that if we only complement logarithmically many values, this class is same as $\mathsf{VP}$ over min-plus semirings. If we complement super-logarithmically many values, then $\mathsf{VNP} \neq \mathsf{VP}$. ii) We consider constant-width ABPs (which are also called incremental dynamic programs that are restricted to use only a constant number of registers) and show that even simple problems like computing the min-weight $2$-edge-matching is impossible with width $2$ (or $2$ registers). However, with width $3$ (or $3$ registers), such programs can compute everything. More generally, we show that constant-depth formulas are efficiently simulated by constant-width ABPs. iii) We show that an exponential hypercube sum (min in the semiring) over even provably weak models such as width-$2$ ABPs and products of linear forms are the same as $\mathsf{VNP}$.