Michael Leznik

Michael Leznik

Geometric deep learning organises neural architectures around the symmetries of their data domain, with the choice of symmetry group serving as a geometric prior that determines what representations can be learned. Metric-Aware Principal Component Analysis (MAPCA) parameterises principal component analysis by a positive-definite metric matrix, with a canonical subfamily interpolating between standard PCA and output whitening and a diagonal-metric point recovering Invariant PCA (IPCA). This paper positions MAPCA within the geometric deep learning framework. The metric is read as the geometric prior; the orthogonal group preserving it is the symmetry group it induces; MAPCA solutions are equivariant under this group with the resulting spectrum invariant; and MAPCA's defining constraint is the linear analogue of the Schur-type weight constraints used in equivariant networks. Across six axes - domain, symmetry group, equivariance, invariance, architectural primitive, and geometric prior - we construct a precise dictionary between MAPCA and geometric deep learning. The technical anchor is a uniqueness theorem characterising IPCA as the unique linear data-derived metric in the MAPCA family that is equivariant under arbitrary diagonal rescaling and projects onto the fixed-point set of the action, equivalent under normalisation to the variance-maximisation criterion in its precise form. The paper closes with three bridges: kernel PCA as the nonlinear extension, spectral graph methods as MAPCA on graphs, and a deep MAPCA construction extending the positioning into deep equivariant networks

Michael Leznik

We introduce Metric-Aware Principal Component Analysis (MAPCA), a unified framework for scale-invariant representation learning based on the generalised eigenproblem max Tr(W^T Sigma W) subject to W^T M W = I, where M is a symmetric positive definite metric matrix. The choice of M determines the representation geometry. The canonical beta-family M(beta) = Sigma^beta, beta in [0,1], provides continuous spectral bias control between standard PCA (beta=0) and output whitening (beta=1), with condition number kappa(beta) = (lambda_1/lambda_p)^(1-beta) decreasing monotonically to isotropy. The diagonal metric M = D = diag(Sigma) recovers Invariant PCA (IPCA), a method rooted in Frisch (1928) diagonal regression, as a distinct member of the broader framework. We prove that scale invariance holds if and only if the metric transforms as M_tilde = CMC under rescaling C, a condition satisfied exactly by IPCA but not by the general beta-family at intermediate values. Beyond its classical interpretation, MAPCA provides a geometric language that unifies several self-supervised learning objectives. Barlow Twins and ZCA whitening correspond to beta=1 (output whitening); VICReg's variance term corresponds to the diagonal metric. A key finding is that W-MSE, despite being described as a whitening-based method, corresponds to M = Sigma^{-1} (beta = -1), outside the spectral compression range entirely and in the opposite spectral direction to Barlow Twins. This distinction between input and output whitening is invisible at the level of loss functions and becomes precise only within the MAPCA framework.

Michael Leznik

The Expected Calibration Error (ece), the dominant calibration metric in machine learning, compares predicted probabilities against empirical frequencies of binary outcomes. This is appropriate when labels are binary events. However, many modern settings produce labels that are themselves probabilities rather than binary outcomes: a radiologist's stated confidence, a teacher model's soft output in knowledge distillation, a class posterior derived from a generative model, or an annotator agreement fraction. In these settings, ece commits a category error - it discards the probabilistic information in the label by forcing it into a binary comparison. The result is not a noisy approximation that more data will correct. It is a structural misalignment that persists and converges to the wrong answer with increasing precision as sample size grows. We introduce the Soft Mean Expected Calibration Error (smece), a calibration metric for settings where labels are of probabilistic nature. The modification to the ece formula is one line: replace the empirical hard-label fraction in each prediction bin with the mean probability label of the samples in that bin. smece reduces exactly to ece when labels are binary, making it a strict generalisation.