Tianlei Ying

Langzhang Liang, Ming Yang, Yi Feng et al.

Protein sequence generation for engineering requires samples that are biophysically plausible and, when targeting a family/domain, remain recognizable members while exploring within-family diversity. Current discrete generative models typically start from uniform or masked-token noise, which discards strong position-specific constraints induced by evolution and forces the model to reconstruct conserved residues from scratch, leading to weak family control and low plausibility. We propose \emph{LineageFlow}, a Dirichlet flow-matching model that initializes generation from lineage priors derived from ancestral sequence reconstruction, turning generation into structured mutation from an evolved scaffold. Across diverse protein families, LineageFlow achieves family validity close to held-out natural sequences and improves predicted structural confidence over uniform-/mask-initialized baselines while maintaining substantial novelty and diversity. Finally, we introduce \emph{rerouting}, a single intermediate-time mutate--select--amplify intervention that enables objective-guided sampling without per-step predictor guidance and yields further gains in plausibility, including a zero-shot enzyme generation case study. Code is available at https://github.com/Jinx-byebye/LineageFlow.

Jingqi Tong, Mingzhe Li, Hangcheng Li et al.

Great scientists have strong judgement and foresight, closely tied to what we call scientific taste. Here, we use the term to refer to the capacity to judge and propose research ideas with high potential impact. However, most relative research focuses on improving an AI scientist's executive capability, while enhancing an AI's scientific taste remains underexplored. In this work, we propose Reinforcement Learning from Community Feedback (RLCF), a training paradigm that uses large-scale community signals as supervision, and formulate scientific taste learning as a preference modeling and alignment problem. For preference modeling, we train Scientific Judge on 700K field- and time-matched pairs of high- vs. low-citation papers to judge ideas. For preference alignment, using Scientific Judge as a reward model, we train a policy model, Scientific Thinker, to propose research ideas with high potential impact. Experiments show Scientific Judge outperforms SOTA LLMs (e.g., GPT-5.2, Gemini 3 Pro) and generalizes to future-year test, unseen fields, and peer-review preference. Furthermore, Scientific Thinker proposes research ideas with higher potential impact than baselines. Our findings show that AI can learn scientific taste, marking a key step toward reaching human-level AI scientists.