L. Sunil Chandran

L. Sunil Chandran, Rishikesh Gajjala, Kuldeep S. Meel

Model counting is a fundamental problem that consists of determining the number of satisfying assignments for a given Boolean formula. The weighted variant, which computes the weighted sum of satisfying assignments, has extensive applications in probabilistic reasoning, network reliability, statistical physics, and formal verification. A common approach for solving weighted model counting is to reduce it to unweighted model counting, which raises an important question: {\em What is the minimum number of terms (or clauses) required to construct a DNF (or CNF) formula with exactly $k$ satisfying assignments?} In this paper, we establish both upper and lower bounds on this question. We prove that for any natural number $k$, one can construct a monotone DNF formula with exactly $k$ satisfying assignments using at most $O(\sqrt{\log k}\log\log k)$ terms. This construction represents the first $o(\log k)$ upper bound for this problem. We complement this result by showing that there exist infinitely many values of $k$ for which any DNF or CNF representation requires at least $Ω(\log\log k)$ terms or clauses. These results have significant implications for the efficiency of model counting algorithms based on formula transformations.

Dhanyamol Antony, L. Sunil Chandran, Anita Das et al.

The Burning Number Problem (BNP) models the spread of information or contagion in a network through a discrete-time process on a graph. At each step, one new vertex is selected as a burning source, while fire simultaneously spreads from previously burned vertices to their neighbors. The burning number of a graph is the minimum number of steps required to burn all vertices. The decision version asks whether the burning number is at most a given integer $k$. BNP is known to be NP-complete even on restricted graph classes such as path forests. We study BNP on connected regular graphs, a natural and previously unexplored graph class. We prove that BNP is NP-complete on connected cubic graphs, and moreover APX-hard under this restriction. We further show that BNP remains APX-hard on connected $d$-regular graphs for every fixed $d \geq 4$.

L. Sunil Chandran, Rishikesh Gajjala, Abraham M. Illickan

Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states are quantum states involving at least three entangled particles. They are of fundamental interest in quantum information theory, and the construction of such states of high dimension has various applications in quantum communication and cryptography. They are of fundamental interest in quantum information theory, and the construction of such states of high dimension has various applications in quantum communication and cryptography. Krenn, Gu and Zeilinger discovered a correspondence between a large class of quantum optical experiments which produce GHZ states and edge-weighted edge-coloured multi-graphs with some special properties called the \emph{GHZ graphs}. On such GHZ graphs, a graph parameter called \emph{dimension} can be defined, which is the same as the dimension of the GHZ state produced by the corresponding experiment. Krenn and Gu conjectured that the dimension of any GHZ graph with more than $4$ vertices is at most $2$. An affirmative resolution of the Krenn-Gu conjecture has implications for quantum resource theory. On the other hand, the construction of a GHZ graph on a large number of vertices with a high dimension would lead to breakthrough results. In this paper, we study the existence of GHZ graphs from the perspective of the Krenn-Gu conjecture and show that the conjecture is true for graphs of vertex connectivity at most 2 and for cubic graphs. We also show that the minimal counterexample to the conjecture should be $4$-connected. Such information could be of great help in the search for GHZ graphs using existing tools like PyTheus. While the impact of the work is in quantum physics, the techniques in this paper are purely combinatorial, and no background in quantum physics is required to understand them.

Dhanyamol Antony, L. Sunil Chandran, Dalu Jacob et al.

Inversion of a directed graph $D$ with respect to a vertex subset $Y$ is the directed graph obtained from $D$ by reversing the direction of every arc whose endpoints both lie in $Y$. More generally, the inversion of $D$ with respect to a tuple $(Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_\ell)$ of vertex subsets is defined as the directed graph obtained by successively applying inversions with respect to $Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_\ell$. Such a tuple is called a \emph{decycling family} of $D$ if the resulting graph is acyclic. In the \textsc{$k$-Inversion} problem, the input consists of a directed graph $D$ and an integer $k$, and the task is to decide whether $D$ admits a decycling family of size at most $k$. Alon et al.\ (SIAM J.\ Discrete Math., 2024) proved that the problem is NP-complete for every fixed value of $k$, thereby ruling out XP algorithms, and presented a fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm parameterized by $k$ for tournament inputs. In this paper, we generalize their algorithm to a broader variant of the problem on tournaments and subsequently use this result to obtain an FPT algorithm for \textsc{$k$-Inversion} when the underlying undirected graph of the input is a block graph. Furthermore, we obtain an algorithm for \textsc{$k$-Inversion} on general directed graphs with running time $2^{O(\mathrm{tw}(k + \mathrm{tw}))} \cdot n^{O(1)}$, where $\mathrm{tw}$ denotes the treewidth of the underlying graph.

Dhanyamol Antony, L. Sunil Chandran, Anita Das et al.

Graph burning is a discrete-time process that models the propagation of information in a network. Initially, we have an undirected graph of unburned vertices. At each time step, an unburned vertex is chosen to burn; additionally, unburned vertices with at least one burned neighbor from the previous step also become burned. Once a vertex is burned, it remains burned for all future steps. The burning number of a graph is the minimum number of steps to burn all the vertices of the graph. The BURNING NUMBER PROBLEM asks whether the burning number of an input graph $G$ is at most $k$ or not. In this paper, we study the BURNING NUMBER PROBLEM both from an algorithmic and a structural viewpoint. The BURNING NUMBER PROBLEM is known to be NP-complete for interval graphs. Here, we prove that this problem is NP-complete even when restricted to connected proper interval graphs. The well-known burning number conjecture asserts that the burning number of a connected graph of order $n$ is at most $\lceil \sqrt{n}~\rceil$. In line with this conjecture, the upper and lower bounds of the burning number are well-studied for various graph classes. Here, we provide an improved upper bound for the burning number of connected $P_k$-free graphs and show that the bound is tight up to an additive constant of $1$. Finally, we study two variants of the problem: edge burning and total burning. We establish their relationship with the classical burning and evaluate the algorithmic complexity of these variants.