Sara Pettinari

Martina De Sanctis, Gianluca Filippone, Paola Inverardi et al.

This paper addresses the challenge of operationalizing ethics in autonomous systems through runtime enforcement. It first conceptualizes the system's ethical space and outlines a structured ethics assurance process. Building on this foundation, it introduces an enforcement subsystem that operationalizes ethical rules, specifically social, legal, ethical, empathetic, and cultural (SLEEC) requirements, through the Abstract State Machine (ASM) formalism. The enforcement subsystem is built on the MAPE-K control-loop architecture for monitoring and controlling the system's ethical behavior, and it relies on an ASM-based runtime model of the ethical rules to enforce. This enables the dynamic evaluation, adaptation, and enforcement of ethical behavior within a runtime formal model. The overall approach, named SLEEC@run.time, is demonstrated on an assistive robot scenario, showcasing how both the robot's behavior and the governing ethical rules can dynamically adapt to contextual changes. By leveraging a flexible runtime model, SLEEC@run.time accommodates changes such as the addition or removal of SLEEC rules, ensuring a robust and evolvable approach to ethical assurance in autonomous systems. The evaluation of SLEEC@run.time shows that it effectively ensures the system's adherence to ethical principles with negligible execution time overhead.

Gianluca Filippone, Sara Pettinari, Patrizio Pelliccione

Robots are increasingly deployed across diverse domains and designed for multi-purpose operation. As robotic systems grow in complexity and operate in dynamic environments, the need for structured, expressive, and scalable mission-specification approaches becomes critical, with mission specifications often defined in the field by domain experts rather than robotics specialists. However, there is no standard or widely accepted formalism for specifying missions in single- or multi-robot systems. A variety of formalisms, such as Behavior Trees, State Machines, Hierarchical Task Networks, and Business Process Model and Notation, have been adopted in robotics to varying degrees, each providing different levels of abstraction, expressiveness, and support for integration with human workflows and external devices. This paper presents a systematic analysis of these four formalisms with respect to their suitability for robot mission specification. Our study focuses on mission-level descriptions rather than robot software development. We analyze their underlying control structures and mission concepts, evaluate their expressiveness and limitations in modeling real-world missions, and assess the extent of available tool support. By comparing the formalisms and validating our findings with experts, we provide insights into their applicability, strengths, and shortcomings in robotic system modeling. The results aim to support practitioners and researchers in selecting appropriate modeling approaches for designing robust and adaptable robot and multi-robot missions.