CGFeb 16
Sometimes Two Irrational Guards are NeededLucas Meijer, Tillmann Miltzow
In the art gallery problem, we are given a closed polygon $P$, with rational coordinates and an integer $k$. We are asked whether it is possible to find a set (of guards) $G$ of size $k$ such that any point $p\in P$ is seen by a point in $G$. We say two points $p$, $q$ see each other if the line segment $pq$ is contained inside $P$. It was shown by Abrahamsen, Adamaszek, and Miltzow that there is a polygon that can be guarded with three guards, but requires four guards if the guards are required to have rational coordinates. In other words, an optimal solution of size three might need to be irrational. We show that an optimal solution of size two might need to be irrational. Note that it is well-known that any polygon that can be guarded with one guard has an optimal guard placement with rational coordinates. Hence, our work closes the gap on when irrational guards are possible to occur.
29.0CGApr 29
The Nesting Bird Box Problem is ER-complete: Sharp Hardness Results for the Hidden Set ProblemLucas Meijer, Till Miltzow, Johanna Ockenfels et al.
In the (Nesting) Bird Box Problem we are given a polygonal domain P and a number k and we want to know if there is a set B of k points inside P such that no two points in B can see each other. The underlying idea is that each point represents a birdhouse and many birds only use a birdhouse if there is no other occupied birdhouse in its vicinity. We say two points a,b see each other if the open segment ab intersects neither the exterior of P nor any vertex of P. We show that the Nesting Bird Box problem is ER-complete. The complexity class ER can be defined by the set of problems that are polynomial time equivalent to finding a solution to the equation $p(x) = 0$, with $x\in R^n$ and $p\in $Z[X_1,...,X_n]$. The proof builds on the techniques developed in the original ER-completeness proof of the Art Gallery problem. However our proof is significantly shorter for two reasons. First, we can use recently developed tools that were not available at the time. Second, we consider polygonal domains with holes instead of simple polygons.