Sunil Arya

Sunil Arya, David M. Mount

Cauchy's surface area formula expresses the surface area of a convex body as the average area of its orthogonal projections over all directions. While this tool is fundamental in Euclidean geometry, with applications ranging from geometric tomography to approximation theory, extensions to non-Euclidean settings remain less explored. In this paper, we establish an analog of Cauchy's formula for the Funk geometry induced by a convex body $K$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, for the Holmes--Thompson surface area. The formula is based on central projections to boundary points of $K$. We show that when $K$ is a convex polytope, the formula reduces to a weighted sum of contributions associated with the vertices of $K$. Finally, as a consequence of our analysis, we derive a generalization of Crofton's formula for surface areas in the Funk geometry. By viewing Euclidean, Minkowski, Hilbert, and hyperbolic geometries as limiting or special cases of the Funk setting, our results provide a unified framework for these classical surface area formulas.

Sunil Arya, David M. Mount

We prove polarity duality for covering problems in Hilbert geometry. Let $G$ and $K$ be convex bodies in $\mathbb{R}^d$ where $G \subset \operatorname{int}(K)$ and $\operatorname{int}(G)$ contains the origin. Let $N^H_K(G,α)$ and $S^H_K(G,α)$ denote, respectively, the minimum numbers of radius-$α$ Hilbert balls in the geometry induced by $K$ needed to cover $G$ and $\partial G$. Our main result is a Hilbert-geometric analogue of the König-Milman covering duality: there exists an absolute constant $c \geq 1$ such that for any $α\in (0,1]$, \[ c^{-d}\,N^H_{G^{\circ}}(K^{\circ},α) ~ \leq ~ N^H_K(G,α) ~ \leq ~ c^{d}\,N^H_{G^{\circ}}(K^{\circ},α), \] and likewise, \[ c^{-d}\,S^H_{G^{\circ}}(K^{\circ},α) ~ \leq ~ S^H_K(G,α) ~ \leq ~ c^{d}\,S^H_{G^{\circ}}(K^{\circ},α). \] We also recover the classical volumetric duality for translative coverings of centered convex bodies, and obtain a new boundary-covering duality in that setting. The Hilbert setting is subtler than the translative one because the metric is not translation invariant, and the local Finsler unit ball depends on the base point. The proof involves several ideas, including $α$-expansions, a stability lemma that controls the interaction between polarity and expansion, and, in the boundary case, a localized relative isoperimetric argument combined with Holmes--Thompson area estimates. In addition, we provide an alternative proof of Faifman's polarity bounds for Holmes--Thompson volume and area in the Funk and Hilbert geometries.