Lutz Schröder

Sergey Goncharov, Stefan Milius, Lutz Schröder et al.

Compositionality proofs in higher-order languages are notoriously involved, and general semantic frameworks guaranteeing compositionality are hard to come by. In particular, Turi and Plotkin's bialgebraic abstract GSOS framework, which has been successfully applied to obtain off-the-shelf compositionality results for first-order languages, so far does not apply to higher-order languages. In the present work, we develop a theory of abstract GSOS specifications for higher-order languages, in effect transferring the core principles of Turi and Plotkin's framework to a higher-order setting. In our theory, the operational semantics of higher-order languages is represented by certain dinatural transformations that we term pointed higher-order GSOS laws. We give a general compositionality result that applies to all systems specified in this way and discuss how compositionality of the SKI calculus and the $λ$-calculus w.r.t. a strong variant of Abramsky's applicative bisimilarity are obtained as instances.

Sergey Goncharov, Stefan Milius, Lutz Schröder et al.

Compositionality proofs in higher-order languages are notoriously involved, and general semantic frameworks guaranteeing compositionality are hard to come by. In particular, Turi and Plotkin's bialgebraic abstract GSOS framework, which provides off-the-shelf compositionality results for first-order languages, so far does not apply to higher-order languages. In the present work, we develop a theory of abstract GSOS specifications for higher-order languages, in effect transferring the core principles of Turi and Plotkin's framework to a higher-order setting. In our theory, the operational semantics of higher-order languages is represented by certain dinatural transformations that we term \emph{(pointed) higher-order GSOS laws}. We give a general compositionality result that applies to all systems specified in this way and discuss how compositionality of combinatory logics and the $λ$-calculus w.r.t.\ a strong variant of Abramsky's applicative bisimilarity are obtained as instances.

Simon Prucker, Stefan Milius, Lutz Schröder

Data words with binders formalize concurrently allocated memory. Most name-binding mechanisms in formal languages, such as the $λ$-calculus, adhere to properly nested scoping. In contrast, stateful programming languages with explicit memory allocation and deallocation, such as C, commonly interleave the scopes of allocated memory regions. This phenomenon is captured in dedicated formalisms such as dynamic sequences and bracket algebra, which similarly feature explicit allocation and deallocation of letters. One of the classical formalisms for data languages are register automata, which have been shown to be equivalent to automata models over nominal sets. In the present work, we introduce a nominal automaton model for languages of data words with explicit allocation and deallocation that strongly resemble dynamic sequences, extending existing nominal automata models by adding deallocating transitions. Using a finite NFA-type representation of the model, we establish a Kleene theorem that shows equivalence with a natural expression language. Moreover, we show that our non-deterministic model allows for determinization, a quite unusual phenomenon in the realm of nominal and register automata.