Ying Shuai Quan

Ying Shuai Quan, Paolo Falcone, Jonas Sjöberg

Safety-critical motion planning in mixed traffic remains challenging for autonomous vehicles, especially when it involves interactions between the ego vehicle (EV) and surrounding vehicles (SVs). In dense traffic, the feasibility of a lane change depends strongly on how SVs respond to the EV motion. This paper presents an interaction-aware safety framework that incorporates such interactions into a control barrier function (CBF)-based safety assessment. The proposed method predicts near-future vehicle positions over a finite horizon, thereby capturing reactive SV behavior and embedding it into the CBF-based safety constraint. To address uncertainty in the SV response model, a robust extension is developed by treating the model mismatch as a bounded disturbance and incorporating an online uncertainty estimate into the barrier condition. Compared with classical environmental CBF methods that neglect SV reactions, the proposed approach provides a less conservative and more informative safety representation for interactive traffic scenarios, while improving robustness to uncertainty in the modeled SV behavior.

Bhaskar Varma, Ying Shuai Quan, Karl D. von Ellenrieder et al.

In this letter, we consider the problem of decentralized decision making among connected autonomous vehicles at unsignalized intersections, where existing centralized approaches do not scale gracefully under mixed maneuver intentions and coordinator failure. We propose a closed-loop opinion-dynamic decision model for intersection coordination, where vehicles exchange intent through dual signed networks: a conflict topology based communication network and a commitment-driven belief network that enable cooperation without a centralized coordinator. Continuous opinion states modulate velocity optimizer weights prior to commitment; a closed-form predictive feasibility gate then freezes each vehicle's decision into a GO or YIELD commitment, which propagates back through the belief network to pre-condition neighbor behavior ahead of physical conflicts. Crossing order emerges from geometric feasibility and arrival priority without the use of joint optimization or a solver. The approach is validated across three scenarios spanning fully competitive, merge, and mixed conflict topologies. The results demonstrate collision-free coordination and lower last-vehicle exit times compared to first come first served (FCFS) in all conflict non-trivial configurations.