Sogol Kharrazi

Ipek Kuvvetli, Christofer Sundström, Sogol Kharrazi et al.

This paper presents a comparative optimization framework for smart charging of electrified vehicle fleets. Using heuristic sequential dynamic programming (SeqDP), the framework minimizes electricity costs while adhering to constraints related to the power grid, charging infrastructure, vehicle availability, and simple considerations of battery aging. Based on real-world operational data, the model incorporates discrete energy states, time-varying tariffs, and state-of-charge (SoC) targets to deliver a scalable and cost-effective solution. Classical DP approach suffers from exponential computational complexity as the problem size increases. This becomes particularly problematic when conducting monthly-scale analyses aimed at minimizing peak power demand across all vehicles. The extended time horizon, coupled with multi-state decision-making, renders exact optimization impractical at larger scales. To address this, a heuristic method is employed to enable systematic aggregation and tractable computation for the Non-Linear Programming (NLP) problem. Rather than seeking a globally optimal solution, this study focuses on a time-efficient smart charging strategy that aims to minimize energy cost while flattening the overall power profile. In this context, a sequential heuristic DP approach is proposed. Its performance is evaluated against a full-fleet solver using Gurobi, a widely used commercial solver in both academia and industry. The proposed algorithm achieves a reduction of the overall cost and peak power by more than 90% compared to uncontrolled schedules. Its relative cost remains within 9\% of the optimal values obtained from the full-fleet solver, and its relative peak-power deviation stays below 15% for larger fleets.

Erik Gustaf Lilljebjörn, Sogol Kharrazi, Jan Åslund et al.

The driveability of a new heavy-truck driveline is traditionally assessed using physical prototypes. Enabling early evaluation of the driving experience in a human-in-the-loop driving simulator using a virtual prototype has the potential to significantly improve development efficiency. To enable driveability assessment using a moving-base simulator, participants must be able to perceive small differences in longitudinal acceleration. The just-noticeable difference (JND) was therefore evaluated for two variants of the classical motion-cueing algorithm (MCA) tuned specifically for tip-in/launch tests and compared to a more general variant in a driving simulator with a long linear track. Psychometric functions were fitted to responses obtained using a weighted staircase procedure and analysed using a generalized linear model. No significant differences in JND were found between the motion cueing variants. The mean JND across all participants and MCA variants was 5.4%. The mean point of subjective equality in the JND experiment was -1.9%, suggesting that participants perceived the acceleration as higher in the second stimulus of a pair. In a subjective comparison, most participants preferred the motion cueing variants that were tuned for launch manoeuvres over the general variant.