Anannya Upasana

Matthias Bentert, Fedor v. Fomin, Petr A. Golovach et al.

We study extensions of the classic \emph{Line Cover} problem, which asks whether a set of $n$ points in the plane can be covered using $k$ lines. Line Cover is known to be NP-hard, and we focus on two natural generalizations. The first is \textbf{Line Clustering}, where the goal is to find $k$ lines minimizing the sum of squared distances from the input points to their nearest line. The second is \textbf{Hyperplane Cover}, which asks whether $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ can be covered by $k$ hyperplanes. We also study the more general \textbf{Projective Clustering} problem, which unifies both settings and has applications in machine learning, data analysis, and computational geometry. In this problem, one seeks $k$ affine subspaces of dimension $r$ that minimize the sum of squared distances from the given points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ to the nearest subspace. Our results reveal notable differences in the parameterized complexity of these problems. While Line Cover is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by $k$, we show that Line Clustering is W[1]-hard with respect to $k$ and does not admit an algorithm with running time $n^{o(k)}$ unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. Hyperplane Cover has been known to be NP-hard since the 1980s, following work of Megiddo and Tamir, even for $d=2$, we show that it remains NP-hard even when $k=2$. Finally, we present an algorithm for Projective Clustering running in $n^{O(dk(r+1))}$ time. This bound matches our lower bound for Line Clustering and generalizes the classic algorithm for $k$-Means Clustering ($r=0$) by Inaba, Katoh, and Imai [SoCG 1994].

Sobyasachi Chatterjee, Sushmita Gupta, Saket Saurabh et al.

We study a natural generalization of the classical \textsc{Dominating Set} problem, called \textsc{Dominating Set with Quotas} (DSQ). In this problem, we are given a graph \( G \), an integer \( k \), and for each vertex \( v \in V(G) \), a lower quota \( \mathrm{lo}_v \) and an upper quota \( \mathrm{up}_v \). The goal is to determine whether there exists a set \( S \subseteq V(G) \) of size at most \( k \) such that for every vertex \( v \in V(G) \), the number of vertices in its closed neighborhood that belong to \( S \), i.e., \( |N[v] \cap S| \), lies within the range \( [\mathrm{lo}_v, \mathrm{up}_v] \). This richer model captures a variety of practical settings where both under- and over-coverage must be avoided -- such as in fault-tolerant infrastructure, load-balanced facility placement, or constrained communication networks. While DS is already known to be computationally hard, we show that the added expressiveness of per-vertex quotas in DSQ introduces additional algorithmic challenges. In particular, we prove that DSQ becomes \W[1]-hard even on structurally sparse graphs -- such as those with degeneracy 2, or excluding \( K_{3,3} \) as a subgraph -- despite these classes admitting FPT algorithms for DS. On the positive side, we show that DSQ is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by solution size and treewidth, and more generally, on nowhere dense graph classes. Furthermore, we design a subexponential-time algorithm for DSQ on apex-minor-free graphs using the bidimensionality framework. These results collectively offer a refined view of the algorithmic landscape of DSQ, revealing a sharp contrast with the classical DS problem and identifying the key structural properties that govern tractability.