Shreyas Patil

Hinduja Nirujan, Shreyas Patil, Abdallah Ayoub et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate summaries of software bug reports, including sections such as Steps-to-Reproduce (S2R), Actual Behavior (AB), and Expected Behavior (EB). However, these models frequently produce hallucinations that can be convincing but unsupported by the source report. This can mislead developers and reduce trust in automated maintenance tools. Existing hallucination detection approaches typically evaluate outputs at the full-response level and do not consider the structure of technical documents. An initial exploratory study on 80 structured bug report summaries found that approximately 47.9% contained missing information, while 12.3% included fabricated content, highlighting the need for systematic hallucination analysis in bug report summarization. In this work, we empirically investigate hallucinations in LLM-generated bug report summaries from a section-aware perspective. Using the BugsRepo dataset, derived from Mozilla OSS projects, we introduce controlled synthetic hallucination injection to construct a benchmark for training and evaluation. We propose a section-aware hallucination detection approach that jointly predicts whether a summary contains hallucinated content, identifies affected sections, and classifies hallucination types. Experimental results across multiple pretrained language models show that the proposed approach achieves strong performance across all tasks, with the best model obtaining 0.89 report-level Macro-F1, 0.83 section-level Macro-F1, and 0.84 hallucination-type Macro-F1. We further analyze common hallucination patterns and model failure modes to better understand limitations of current LLM-generated bug report summaries. The findings highlight the importance of section-aware hallucination analysis for improving the reliability of LLM-assisted bug report summarization in software maintenance workflows.

Shreyas Patil, Pragati Kumari, Novarun Deb et al.

The continuous evolution of system specifications necessitates frequent evaluation of conflicting requirements, a process that is traditionally labour intensive. Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential for automating this detection, their massive computational requirements often result in excessive energy waste. Consequently, there is a growing need to transition toward Small Language Models (SLMs) and energy aware architectures for sustainable Requirements Engineering. This study proposes and empirically evaluates an energy aware framework that compares Knowledge Graph-based Retrieval (KGR) with Vector-based Semantic Retrieval (VSR) to enhance SLM-based inference at the 7B to 8B parameter scale. By leveraging structured graph traversal and high dimensional semantic mapping, we extract candidate requirements, which are then classified as conflicting or neutral by an inference engine. We evaluate these retrieval enhanced strategies across Zero-Shot, Few-Shot, and Chain of Thoughts prompting methods. Using a three-pillar sustainability framework measuring energy consumption (Wh), latency (s), and carbon emissions (gCO2eq) alongside standard accuracy metrics (F1 Score), this research provides a first systematic empirical evaluation and trade off analysis between predictive performance and environmental impact. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of structured versus semantic retrieval in detecting requirement conflicts, offering a reproducible, sustainability aware architecture for energy efficient requirement engineering.