Sigal Gottlieb

NA
13papers
421citations
Novelty50%
AI Score45

13 Papers

NAMay 22, 2011
Long time stability of a classical efficient scheme for two dimensional Navier-Stokes equations

Sigal Gottlieb, Florentina Tone, Cheng Wang et al.

We prove that a popular classical implicit-explicit scheme for the 2D incompressible Navier--Stokes equations that treats the viscous term implicitly while the nonlinear advection term explicitly is long time stable provided that the time step is sufficiently small in the case with periodic boundary conditions. The long time stability in the $L^2$ and $H^1$ norms further leads to the convergence of the global attractors and invariant measures of the scheme to those of the NSE itself at vanishing time step. Both semi-discrete in time and fully discrete schemes with either Galerkin Fourier spectral or collocation Fourier spectral methods are considered.

NAFeb 15, 2017
Implicit and Implicit-Explicit Strong Stability Preserving Runge-Kutta Methods with High Linear Order

Sidafa Conde, Sigal Gottlieb, Zachary J. Grant et al.

When evolving in time the solution of a hyperbolic partial differential equation, it is often desirable to use high order strong stability preserving (SSP) time discretizations. These time discretizations preserve the monotonicity properties satisfied by the spatial discretization when coupled with the first order forward Euler, under a certain time-step restriction. While the allowable time-step depends on both the spatial and temporal discretizations, the contribution of the temporal discretization can be isolated by taking the ratio of the allowable time-step of the high order method to the forward Euler time-step. This ratio is called the strong stability coefficient. The search for high order strong stability time-stepping methods with high order and large allowable time-step had been an active area of research. It is known that implicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods exist only up to sixth order. However, if we restrict ourselves to solving only linear autonomous problems, the order conditions simplify and we can find implicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods of any linear order. In the current work we aim to find very high linear order implicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods that are optimal in terms of allowable time-step. Next, we formulate an optimization problem for implicit-explicit (IMEX) SSP Runge-Kutta methods and find implicit methods with large linear stability regions that pair with known explicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods of orders plin=3,4,6 as well as optimized IMEX SSP Runge-Kutta pairs that have high linear order and nonlinear orders p=2,3,4. These methods are then tested on sample problems to verify order of convergence and to demonstrate the sharpness of the SSP coefficient and the typical behavior of these methods on test problems.

NAMar 23, 2016
Explicit Strong Stability Preserving Multistage Two-Derivative Time-Stepping Schemes

Andrew J. Christieb, Sigal Gottlieb, Zachary J. Grant et al.

High order strong stability preserving (SSP) time discretizations are advantageous for use with spatial discretizations with nonlinear stability properties for the solution of hyperbolic PDEs. The search for high order strong stability time-stepping methods with large allowable strong stability time-step has been an active area of research over the last two decades. Recently, multiderivative time-stepping methods have been implemented with hyperbolic PDEs. In this work we describe sufficient conditions for a two-derivative multistage method to be SSP, and find some optimal SSP multistage two-derivative methods. While explicit SSP Runge--Kutta methods exist only up to fourth order, we show that this order barrier is broken for explicit multi-stage two-derivative methods by designing a three stage fifth order SSP method. These methods are tested on simple scalar PDEs to verify the order of convergence, and demonstrate the need for the SSP condition and the sharpness of the SSP time-step in many cases.

NAJun 18, 2011
Strong stability preserving two-step Runge-Kutta methods

David I. Ketcheson, Sigal Gottlieb, Colin B. Macdonald

We investigate the strong stability preserving (SSP) property of two-step Runge-Kutta (TSRK) methods. We prove that all SSP TSRK methods belong to a particularly simple subclass of TSRK methods, in which stages from the previous step are not used. We derive simple order conditions for this subclass. Whereas explicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods have order at most four, we prove that explicit SSP TSRK methods have order at most eight. We present TSRK methods of up to eighth order that were found by numerical search. These methods have larger SSP coefficients than any known methods of the same order of accuracy, and may be implemented in a form with relatively modest storage requirements. The usefulness of the TSRK methods is demonstrated through numerical examples, including integration of very high order WENO discretizations.

NAAug 14, 2018
Strong Stability Preserving Integrating Factor Runge-Kutta Methods

Sigal Gottlieb, Zachary J. Grant, Leah Isherwood

Strong stability preserving (SSP) Runge-Kutta methods are often desired when evolving in time problems that have two components that have very different time scales. Where the SSP property is needed, it has been shown that implicit and implicit-explicit methods have very restrictive time-steps and are therefore not efficient. For this reason, SSP integrating factor methods may offer an attractive alternative to traditional time-stepping methods for problems with a linear component that is stiff and a nonlinear component that is not. However, the strong stability properties of integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods have not been established. In this work we show that it is possible to define explicit integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods that preserve the desired strong stability properties satisfied by each of the two components when coupled with forward Euler time-stepping, or even given weaker conditions. We define sufficient conditions for an explicit integrating factor Runge--Kutta method to be SSP, namely that they are based on explicit SSP Runge--Kutta methods with non-decreasing abscissas. We find such methods of up to fourth order and up to ten stages, analyze their SSP coefficients, and prove their optimality in a few cases. We test these methods to demonstrate their convergence and to show that the SSP time-step predicted by the theory is generally sharp, and that the non-decreasing abscissa condition is needed in our test cases. Finally, we show that on typical total variation diminishing linear and nonlinear test-cases our new explicit SSP integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods out-perform the corresponding explicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods, implicit-explicit SSP Runge--Kutta methods, and some well-known exponential time differencing methods.

NAOct 18, 2018
A Strong Stability Preserving Analysis for Multistage Two-Derivative Time-Stepping Schemes Based on Taylor Series Conditions

Zachary Grant, Sigal Gottlieb, David C Seal

High order strong stability preserving (SSP) time discretizations are often needed to ensure the nonlinear (and sometimes non-inner-product) strong stability properties of spatial discretizations specially designed for the solution of hyperbolic PDEs. Multiderivative time-stepping methods have recently been increasingly used for evolving hyperbolic PDEs, and the strong stability properties of these methods are of interest. In our prior work we explored time discretizations that preserve the strong stability properties of spatial discretizations coupled with forward Euler and a second derivative formulation. However, many spatial discretizations do not satisfy strong stability properties when coupled with this second derivative formulation, but rather with a more natural Taylor series formulation. In this work we demonstrate sufficient conditions for an explicit two-derivative multistage method to preserve the strong stability properties of spatial discretizations in a forward Euler and Taylor series formulation. We call these strong stability preserving Taylor series (SSP-TS) methods. We also prove that the maximal order of SSP-TS methods is p = 6, and define an optimization procedure that allows us to find such SSP methods. Several types of these methods are presented and their efficiency compared. Finally, these methods are tested on several PDEs to demonstrate the benefit of SSP-TS methods, the need for the SSP property, and the sharpness of the SSP time-step in many cases.

NAAug 24, 2012
Reduced Collocation Methods: Reduced Basis Methods in the Collocation Framework

Yanlai Chen, Sigal Gottlieb

In this paper, we present the first reduced basis method well-suited for the collocation framework. Two fundamentally different algorithms are presented: the so-called Least Squares Reduced Collocation Method (LSRCM) and Empirical Reduced Collocation Method (ERCM). This work provides a reduced basis strategy to practitioners who {prefer} a collocation, rather than Galerkin, approach. Furthermore, the empirical reduced collocation method eliminates a potentially costly online procedure that is needed for non-affine problems with Galerkin approach. Numerical results demonstrate the high efficiency and accuracy of the reduced collocation methods, which match or exceed that of the traditional reduced basis method in the Galerkin framework.

NAOct 7, 2014
A Reduced Radial Basis Function Method for Partial Differential Equations on irregular domains

Yanlai Chen, Sigal Gottlieb, Alfa Heryudono et al.

We propose and test the first Reduced Radial Basis Function Method (R$^2$BFM) for solving parametric partial differential equations on irregular domains. The two major ingredients are a stable Radial Basis Function (RBF) solver that has an optimized set of centers chosen through a reduced-basis-type greedy algorithm, and a collocation-based model reduction approach that systematically generates a reduced-order approximation whose dimension is orders of magnitude smaller than the total number of RBF centers. The resulting algorithm is efficient and accurate as demonstrated through two- and three-dimensional test problems.

NAJan 30, 2017
Error Inhibiting Block One-Step Schemes for Ordinary Differential Equations

Adi Ditkowski, Sigal Gottlieb

The commonly used one step methods and linear multi-step methods all have a global error that is of the same order as the local truncation error (as defined in \cite{gustafsson1995time,quarteroni2010numerical,AllenIsaacson,IsaacsonKeller,Sewell}). In fact, this is true of the entire class of general linear methods. In practice, this means that the order of the method is typically defined solely by the order conditions which are derived by studying the local truncation error. In this work, we investigate the interplay between the local truncation error and the global error, and develop a methodology which defines the construction of explicit {\em error inhibiting} block one-step methods (alternatively written as explicit general linear methods \cite{butcher1993a}). These {\em error inhibiting schemes} are constructed so that the accumulation of the local truncation error over time is controlled, which results in a global error that is one order higher than the local truncation error. In this work, we delineate how to carefully choose the coefficient matrices so that the growth of the local truncation error is inhibited. We then use this theoretical understanding to construct several methods that have higher order global error than local truncation error, and demonstrate their enhanced order of accuracy on test cases. These methods demonstrate that the error inhibiting concept is realizable. Future work will further develop new error inhibiting methods and will analyze the computational efficiency and linear stability properties of these methods.

74.7NAApr 15
Smooth perturbations of diagonally implicit Runge--Kutta methods

John Driscoll, Sigal Gottlieb, Zachary J. Grant et al.

A mixed accuracy framework for Runge--Kutta methods presented in [Grant, JSC 2022] has been shown to speed up the computation in diagonally implicit Runge--Kutta (DIRK) methods by using less expensive low accuracy approaches for the implicit stages. This theory included both smooth and nonsmooth perturbations, and subsequent work focused primarily on the case of nonsmooth perturbations that arise from mixed precision simulations. In this work the focus is on smooth perturbations that arise from using less accurate models or under-resolved iterative solvers to simplify the implicit computations. We develop an accuracy and stability analysis based on the framework in [Grant, JSC 2022] to design methods that strategically replace the original operator by a lower accuracy operator to reduce computational cost while mitigating the effect of the perturbations. In particular, we focus on designing novel methods that are high order for smooth perturbations that satisfy additional local consistency conditions. Finally, we verify the performance of the novel perturbed DIRK methods designed in this work and numerically study the impact of different types of smooth perturbations on the accuracy and stability of the methods.

80.8NAMar 25
Stable corrections for perturbed diagonally implicit Runge--Kutta methods

John Driscoll, Sigal Gottlieb, Zachary J. Grant et al.

A mixed accuracy framework for Runge--Kutta methods presented in Grant [JSC 2022] and applied to diagonally implicit Runge--Kutta (DIRK) methods can significantly speed up the computation by replacing the implicit solver by less expensive low accuracy approaches such as lower precision computation of the implicit solve, under-resolved iterative solvers, or simpler, less accurate models for the implicit stages. Understanding the effect of the perturbation errors introduced by the low accuracy computations enables the design of stable and accurate mixed accuracy DIRK methods where the errors from the low-accuracy computation are damped out by multiplication by \dt at multiple points in the simulation, resulting in a more accurate simulation than if low-accuracy was used for all computation. To improve upon this, explicit corrections were previously proposed and analyzed for accuracy, and their performance was tested in related work. Explicit corrections work well when the time-step is sufficiently small, but may introduce instabilities when the time-step is larger. In this work, the stability of the mixed accuracy approach is carefully studied, and used to design novel stabilized correction approaches.

NAApr 15, 2019
Strong Stability Preserving Integrating Factor Two-step Runge--Kutta Methods

Leah Isherwood, Zachary J. Grant, Sigal Gottlieb

Problems that feature significantly different time scales, where the stiff time-step restriction comes from a linear component, implicit-explicit (IMEX) methods alleviate this restriction if the concern is linear stability. However, where the SSP property is needed, IMEX SSP Runge-Kutta (SSP-IMEX) methods have very restrictive time-steps. An alternative to SSP-IMEX schemes is to adopt an integrating factor approach to handle the linear component exactly and step the transformed problem forward using some time-evolution method. The strong stability properties of integrating factor Runge--Kutta methods were previously established, where it was shown that it is possible to define explicit integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods that preserve strong stability properties satisfied by each of the two components when coupled with forward Euler time-stepping. It was proved that the solution will be SSP if the transformed problem is stepped forward with an explicit SSP Runge-Kutta method that has non-decreasing abscissas. However, explicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods have an order barrier of p=4, and sometimes higher order is desired. In this work we consider explicit SSP two-step Runge--Kutta integrating factor methods to raise the order. We show that strong stability is ensured if the two-step Runge-Kutta method used to evolve the transformed problem is SSP and has non-decreasing abscissas. We find such methods up to eighth order and present their SSP coefficients. Adding a step allows us to break the fourth order barrier on explicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods; furthermore, our explicit SSP two-step Runge--Kutta methods with non-decreasing abscissas typically have larger SSP coefficients than the corresponding one-step methods.

NAOct 10, 2018
Downwinding for Preserving Strong Stability in Explicit Integrating Factor Runge--Kutta Methods

Leah Isherwood, Zachary J. Grant, Sigal Gottlieb

Strong stability preserving (SSP) Runge-Kutta methods are desirable when evolving in time problems that have discontinuities or sharp gradients and require nonlinear non-inner-product stability properties to be satisfied. Unlike the case for L2 linear stability, implicit methods do not significantly alleviate the time-step restriction when the SSP property is needed. For this reason, when handling problems with a linear component that is stiff and a nonlinear component that is not, SSP integrating factor Runge--Kutta methods may offer an attractive alternative to traditional time-stepping methods. The strong stability properties of integrating factor Runge--Kutta methods where the transformed problem is evolved with an explicit SSP Runge--Kutta method with non-decreasing abscissas was recently established. In this work, we consider the use of downwinded spatial operators to preserve the strong stability properties of integrating factor Runge--Kutta methods where the Runge--Kutta method has some decreasing abscissas. We present the SSP theory for this approach and present numerical evidence to show that such an approach is feasible and performs as expected. However, we also show that in some cases the integrating factor approach with explicit SSP Runge--Kutta methods with non-decreasing abscissas performs nearly as well, if not better, than with explicit SSP Runge--Kutta methods with downwinding. In conclusion, while the downwinding approach can be rigorously shown to guarantee the SSP property for a larger time-step, in practice using the integrating factor approach by including downwinding as needed with optimal explicit SSP Runge--Kutta methods does not necessarily provide significant benefit over using explicit SSP Runge--Kutta methods with non-decreasing abscissas.