PÃ¥l Halvorsen

2papers

2 Papers

5.6LGMar 26
Knowledge-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Zero-Shot Psychiatric Data: Privacy Preserving Synthetic Data Generation

Adam Jakobsen, Sushant Gautam, Hugo Lewi Hammer et al.

AI systems in healthcare research have shown potential to increase patient throughput and assist clinicians, yet progress is constrained by limited access to real patient data. To address this issue, we present a zero-shot, knowledge-guided framework for psychiatric tabular data in which large language models (LLMs) are steered via Retrieval-Augmented Generation using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). We conducted experiments using different combinations of knowledge bases to generate privacy-preserving synthetic data. The resulting models were benchmarked against two state-of-the-art deep learning models for synthetic tabular data generation, namely CTGAN and TVAE, both of which rely on real data and therefore entail potential privacy risks. Evaluation was performed on six anxiety-related disorders: specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. CTGAN typically achieves the best marginals and multivariate structure, while the knowledge-augmented LLM is competitive on pairwise structure and attains the lowest pairwise error in separation anxiety and social anxiety. An ablation study shows that clinical retrieval reliably improves univariate and pairwise fidelity over a no-retrieval LLM. Privacy analyses indicate that the real data-free LLM yields modest overlaps and a low average linkage risk comparable to CTGAN, whereas TVAE exhibits extensive duplication despite a low k-map score. Overall, grounding an LLM in clinical knowledge enables high-quality, privacy-preserving synthetic psychiatric data when real datasets are unavailable or cannot be shared.

4.2LGMar 27
The Climber's Grip -- Personalized Deep Learning Models for Fear and Muscle Activity in Climbing

Matthias Boeker, Dana Swarbrick, Ulysse T. A. Côté-Allard et al.

Climbing is a multifaceted sport that combines physical demands and emotional and cognitive challenges. Ascent styles differ in fall distance with lead climbing involving larger falls than top rope climbing, which may result in different perceived risk and fear. In this study, we investigated the psychophysiological relationship between perceived fear and muscle activity in climbers using a combination of statistical modeling and deep learning techniques. We conducted an experiment with 19 climbers, collecting electromyography (EMG), electrocardiography (ECG) and arm motion data during lead and top rope climbing. Perceived fear ratings were collected for the different phases of the climb. Using a linear mixed-effects model, we analyzed the relationships between perceived fear and physiological measures. To capture the non-linear dynamics of this relationship, we extended our analysis to deep learning models and integrated random effects for a personalized modeling approach. Our results showed that random effects improved model performance of the mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). The results showed that muscle fatigue correlates significantly with increased fear during \textit{lead climbing}. This study highlights the potential of combining statistical and deep learning approaches for modeling the interplay between psychological and physiological states during climbing.