20.4ROMar 26
A Minimum-Energy Control Approach for Redundant Mobile Manipulators in Physical Human-Robot Interaction ApplicationsDavide Tebaldi, Niccolò Paradisi, Fabio Pini et al.
Research on mobile manipulation systems that physically interact with humans has expanded rapidly in recent years, opening the way to tasks which could not be performed using fixed-base manipulators. Within this context, developing suitable control methodologies is essential since mobile manipulators introduce additional degrees of freedom, making the design of control approaches more challenging and more prone to performance optimization. This paper proposes a control approach for a mobile manipulator, composed of a mobile base equipped with a robotic arm mounted on the top, with the objective of minimizing the overall kinetic energy stored in the whole-body mobile manipulator in physical human-robot interaction applications. The approach is experimentally tested with reference to a peg-in-hole task, and the results demonstrate that the proposed approach reduces the overall kinetic energy stored in the whole-body robotic system and improves the system performance compared with the benchmark method.
8.7ROApr 24
Adaptive vs. Static Robot-to-Human Handover: A Study on Orientation and Approach DirectionFederico Biagi, Dario Onfiani, Simone Silenzi et al.
Robot-to-human handovers often rely on static, open-loop strategies (or, at best, approaches that adapt only the position), which generally do not consider how the object will be grasped by the human, thus requiring the user to adapt. This work presents a novel adaptive framework that dynamically adjusts the object's delivery pose in real time based on the user's hand pose and the intended downstream task. By integrating AI-based hand pose estimation with smooth, kinematically constrained trajectories, the system ensures a safe approach and an optimal handover orientation. A comprehensive user study compares the proposed adaptive approach against a static baseline across multiple tasks, evaluating both subjective metrics (NASA-TLX, Human-Robot Trust Scale) and objective physiological data (blink rate measured via wearable eye-trackers). The results demonstrate that dynamic alignment significantly reduces users' cognitive workload and physiological stress, while increasing perceived trust in the robot's reliability. These findings highlight the potential of task- and pose-aware systems for enabling fluid and ergonomic human-robot collaboration.
9.6ROApr 2
Integrated Identification of Collaborative Robots for Robot Assisted 3D Printing ProcessesAlessandro Dimauro, Davide Tebaldi, Fabio Pini et al.
In recent years, the integration of additive manufacturing (AM) and industrial robotics has opened new perspectives for the production of complex components, particularly in the automotive sector. Robot-assisted additive manufacturing processes overcome the dimensional and kinematic limitations of traditional Cartesian systems, enabling non-planar deposition and greater geometric flexibility. However, the increasing dynamic complexity of robotic manipulators introduces challenges related to precision, control, and error prediction. This work proposes a model-based approach equipped with an integrated identification procedure of the system's parameters, including the robot, the actuators and the controllers. We show that the integrated modeling procedure allows to obtain a reliable dynamic model even in the presence of sensory and programming limitations typical of collaborative robots. The manipulator's dynamic model is identified through an integrated five step methodology: starting with geometric and inertial analysis, followed by friction and controller parameters identification, all the way to the remaining parameters identification. The proposed procedure intrinsically ensures the physical consistency of the identified parameters. The identification approach is validated on a real world case study involving a 6-Degrees-Of-Freedom (DoFs) collaborative robot used in a thermoplastic extrusion process. The very good matching between the experimental results given by actual robot and those given by the identified model shows the potential enhancement of precision, control, and error prediction in Robot Assisted 3D Printing Processes.