Geri Gokaj

Bartłomiej Dudek, Nick Fischer, Geri Gokaj et al.

We revisit the complexity of verifying basic identities, such as associativity and distributivity, on a given finite algebraic structure. In particular, while Rajagopalan and Schulman (FOCS'96, SICOMP'00) gave a surprising randomized algorithm to verify associativity of an operation $\odot: S\times S\to S$ in optimal time $O(|S|^2)$, they left the open problem of finding any subcubic algorithm for verifying distributivity of given operations $\odot,\oplus: S\times S\to S$. Our results are as follows: * We resolve the open problem by Rajagopalan and Schulman by devising an algorithm verifying distributivity in strongly subcubic time $O(|S|^ω)$, together with a matching conditional lower bound based on the Triangle Detection Hypothesis. * We propose arithmetic progression detection in small universes as a consequential algorithmic challenge: We show that unless we can detect $4$-term arithmetic progressions in a set $X\subseteq\{1,\dots, N\}$ in time $O(N^{2-ε})$, then (a) the 3-uniform 4-hyperclique hypothesis is true, and (b) verifying certain identities requires running time~$|S|^{3-o(1)}$. * A careful combination of our algorithmic and hardness ideas allows us to \emph{fully classify} a natural subclass of identities: Specifically, any 3-variable identity over binary operations in which no side is a subexpression of the other is either: (1) verifiable in randomized time $O(|S|^2)$, (2) verifiable in randomized time $O(|S|^ω)$ with a matching lower bound from triangle detection, or (3) trivially verifiable in time $O(|S|^3)$ with a matching lower bound from hardness of 4-term arithmetic progression detection. * We obtain near-optimal algorithms for verifying whether a given algebraic structure forms a field or ring, and show that \emph{counting} the number of distributive triples is conditionally harder than verifying distributivity.

Geri Gokaj, Marvin Künnemann, Sabine Storandt et al.

The Pareto sum of two-dimensional point sets $P$ and $Q$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$ is defined as the skyline of the points in their Minkowski sum. The problem of efficiently computing the Pareto sum arises frequently in bi-criteria optimization algorithms. Prior work establishes that computing the Pareto sum of sets $P$ and $Q$ of size $n$ suffers from conditional lower bounds that rule out strongly subquadratic $O(n^{2-ε})$-time algorithms, even when the output size is $Θ(n)$. Naturally, we ask: How efficiently can we \emph{approximate} Pareto sums, both in theory and practice? Can we beat the near-quadratic-time state of the art for exact algorithms? On the theoretical side, we formulate a notion of additively approximate Pareto sets and show that computing an approximate Pareto set is \emph{fine-grained equivalent} to Bounded Monotone Min-Plus Convolution. Leveraging a remarkable $\tilde{O}(n^{1.5})$-time algorithm for the latter problem (Chi, Duan, Xie, Zhang; STOC '22), we thus obtain a strongly subquadratic (and conditionally optimal) approximation algorithm for computing Pareto sums. On the practical side, we engineer different algorithmic approaches for approximating Pareto sets on realistic instances. Our implementations enable a granular trade-off between approximation quality and running time/output size compared to the state of the art for exact algorithms established in (Funke, Hespe, Sanders, Storandt, Truschel; Algorithmica '25). Perhaps surprisingly, the (theoretical) connection to Bounded Monotone Min-Plus Convolution remains beneficial even for our implementations: in particular, we implement a simplified, yet still subquadratic version of an algorithm due to Chi, Duan, Xie and Zhang, which on some sufficiently large instances outperforms the competing quadratic-time approaches.