Evan Cavallo

Maximilian Doré, Evan Cavallo, Anders Mörtberg

When working in a proof assistant, automation is key to discharging routine proof goals such as equations between algebraic expressions. Homotopy type theory allows the user to reason about higher structures, such as topological spaces, using higher inductive types (HITs) and univalence. Cubical type theory provides computational support for HITs and univalence. A difficulty when working in cubical type theory is dealing with the complex combinatorics of higher structures, an infinite-dimensional generalisation of equational reasoning. To solve these higher-dimensional equations consists in constructing cubes with specified boundaries. We develop a simplified cubical language in which we isolate and study two automation problems: contortion solving, where we attempt to "contort" a cube to fit a given boundary, and the more general Kan solving, where we search for solutions that involve pasting multiple cubes together. Both problems are difficult in the general case-Kan solving is even undecidable-so we focus on heuristics that perform well on practical examples. Our language encompasses different variations of cubical type theory which differ in their "contortion theory", i.e., the class of contortions they support. We provide a solver for the contortion problem for the most complex contortion theories currently being researched, the Dedekind and De Morgan contortions, by utilizing a reformulation of contortions in terms of poset maps. We solve Kan problems using constraint satisfaction programming, which is applicable independently of the underlying contortion theory. We have implemented our algorithms in an experimental Haskell solver that can be used to automatically solve many goals a user of cubical type theory might face. We illustrate this with a case study establishing the Eckmann-Hilton theorem using our solver, as well as various benchmarks.

Steve Awodey, Evan Cavallo, Thierry Coquand et al.

We develop a constructive model of homotopy type theory in a Quillen model category that classically presents the usual homotopy theory of spaces. Our model is based on presheaves over the cartesian cube category, a well-behaved Eilenberg-Zilber category. The key innovation is an additional equivariance condition in the specification of the cubical Kan fibrations, which can be described as the pullback of an interval-based class of uniform fibrations in the category of symmetric sequences of cubical sets. The main technical results in the development of our model have been formalized in a computer proof assistant.

Evan Cavallo, Christian Sattler

Cubical type theories are designed around an abstract unit interval from which types of paths, used to represent equalities, are defined. Varying the operations available on this interval yields different type theories. A reversal is an involutive operator on the interval that swaps its two endpoints. We show that for cubical type theories with self-dual interval theories, such as the minimal theory of two endpoints or the theory of a bounded distributive lattice, the extension of the theory with a reversal that internalizes the duality is a conservative extension. The key tool is a "twist construction": the product of an interval and its dual is again an interval with a reversal given by swapping coordinates. Our conservativity result applies to "opaque" cubical type theories, without strict equations reducing the filling operator at concrete type formers or eliminators from higher inductive types at path constructors. Using the same twist construction, we also construct models of strict cubical type theory with reversals in categories of cubical sets without reversals. We thereby give the first model of a theory with reversals whose homotopy theory corresponds to that of topological spaces.

Evan Cavallo, Jonas Höfer

It is a well-known theorem of homotopy type theory, originally due to Voevodsky, that function extensionality holds inside any univalent universe. We consider a weaker variant of the univalence axiom, asserting that the wild category formed by the universe is univalent, which we call categorical univalence. We show that categorical univalence does not imply function extensionality by an analysis of Von Glehn's polynomial model construction, which produces models of Martin-Löf type theory that always refute function extensionality. We find in particular that when the base model has a univalent universe, its polynomial model has a universe that is categorically univalent but lacks function extensionality.