Lis Pirotton

Klaus Jansen, Felix Ohnesorge, Lis Pirotton

Consider a high-multiplicity Bin Packing instance $I$ with $d$ distinct item types. In 2014, Goemans and Rothvoss gave an algorithm with runtime ${{|I|}^2}^{O(d)}$ for this problem~[SODA'14], where $|I|$ denotes the encoding length of the instance $I$. Although Jansen and Klein~[SODA'17] later developed an algorithm that improves upon this runtime in a special case, it has remained a major open problem by Goemans and Rothvoss~[J.ACM'20] whether the doubly exponential dependency on $d$ is necessary. We solve this open problem by showing that unless the ETH fails, there is no algorithm solving the high-multiplicity Bin Packing problem in time ${{|I|}^2}^{o(d)}$. To prove this, we introduce a novel reduction from 3-SAT. The core of our construction is efficiently encoding all information from a 3-SAT instance with $n$ variables into an ILP with $O(\log(n))$ variables and constraints. This result confirms that the Goemans and Rothvoss algorithm is essentially best-possible for Bin Packing parameterized by the number $d$ of item sizes in the context of XP time algorithms.

Klaus Jansen, Felix Ohnesorge, Lis Pirotton et al.

Consider the classical Bin Packing problem with $d$ different item sizes $s_i$ and amounts of items $a_i.$ The support of a Bin Packing solution is the number of differently filled bins. In this work, we show that the lower bound on the support of this problem is $2^{Ω(d)}$. Our lower bound matches the upper bound of $2^d$ given by Eisenbrand and Shmonin [Oper.Research Letters '06] up to a constant factor. This result has direct implications for the time complexity of several Bin Packing algorithms, such as Goemans and Rothvoss [SODA '14], Jansen and Klein [SODA '17] and Jansen and Solis-Oba [IPCO '10]. To achieve our main result, we develop a technique to aggregate equality constrained ILPs with many constraints into an equivalent ILP with one constraint. Our technique contrasts existing aggregation techniques as we manage to integrate upper bounds on variables into the resulting constraint. We believe this technique can be useful for solving general ILPs or the $d$-dimensional knapsack problem.

Klaus Jansen, Dirk Nowotka, Lis Pirotton et al.

Patterns are words with terminals and variables. The language of a pattern is the set of words obtained by uniformly substituting all variables with words that contain only terminals. In their original definition, patterns only allow for multiple distinct occurrences of some variables to be related by the equality relation, represented by using the same variable multiple times. In an extended notion, called relational patterns and relational pattern languages, variables may be related by arbitrary other relations. We extend the ongoing investigation of the main decision problems for patterns (namely, the equivalence problem, the inclusion problem, and the membership problem) to relational pattern languages under a wide range of relevant individual relations, providing a comprehensive foundation in all three research directions.