Huangxing Lin

IV
h-index7
5papers
29citations
Novelty52%
AI Score27

5 Papers

4.4IVNov 1, 2021
Self-Verification in Image Denoising

Huangxing Lin, Yihong Zhuang, Delu Zeng et al.

We devise a new regularization, called self-verification, for image denoising. This regularization is formulated using a deep image prior learned by the network, rather than a traditional predefined prior. Specifically, we treat the output of the network as a ``prior'' that we denoise again after ``re-noising''. The comparison between the again denoised image and its prior can be interpreted as a self-verification of the network's denoising ability. We demonstrate that self-verification encourages the network to capture low-level image statistics needed to restore the image. Based on this self-verification regularization, we further show that the network can learn to denoise even if it has not seen any clean images. This learning strategy is self-supervised, and we refer to it as Self-Verification Image Denoising (SVID). SVID can be seen as a mixture of learning-based methods and traditional model-based denoising methods, in which regularization is adaptively formulated using the output of the network. We show the application of SVID to various denoising tasks using only observed corrupted data. It can achieve the denoising performance close to supervised CNNs.

2.0IVNov 30, 2020
Adaptive noise imitation for image denoising

Huangxing Lin, Yihong Zhuang, Yue Huang et al.

The effectiveness of existing denoising algorithms typically relies on accurate pre-defined noise statistics or plenty of paired data, which limits their practicality. In this work, we focus on denoising in the more common case where noise statistics and paired data are unavailable. Considering that denoising CNNs require supervision, we develop a new \textbf{adaptive noise imitation (ADANI)} algorithm that can synthesize noisy data from naturally noisy images. To produce realistic noise, a noise generator takes unpaired noisy/clean images as input, where the noisy image is a guide for noise generation. By imposing explicit constraints on the type, level and gradient of noise, the output noise of ADANI will be similar to the guided noise, while keeping the original clean background of the image. Coupling the noisy data output from ADANI with the corresponding ground-truth, a denoising CNN is then trained in a fully-supervised manner. Experiments show that the noisy data produced by ADANI are visually and statistically similar to real ones so that the denoising CNN in our method is competitive to other networks trained with external paired data.

2.3CVAug 8, 2020Code
Hard Class Rectification for Domain Adaptation

Yunlong Zhang, Changxing Jing, Huangxing Lin et al.

Domain adaptation (DA) aims to transfer knowledge from a label-rich and related domain (source domain) to a label-scare domain (target domain). Pseudo-labeling has recently been widely explored and used in DA. However, this line of research is still confined to the inaccuracy of pseudo-labels. In this paper, we reveal an interesting observation that the target samples belonging to the classes with larger domain shift are easier to be misclassified compared with the other classes. These classes are called hard class, which deteriorates the performance of DA and restricts the applications of DA. We propose a novel framework, called Hard Class Rectification Pseudo-labeling (HCRPL), to alleviate the hard class problem from two aspects. First, as is difficult to identify the target samples as hard class, we propose a simple yet effective scheme, named Adaptive Prediction Calibration (APC), to calibrate the predictions of the target samples according to the difficulty degree for each class. Second, we further consider that the predictions of target samples belonging to the hard class are vulnerable to perturbations. To prevent these samples to be misclassified easily, we introduce Temporal-Ensembling (TE) and Self-Ensembling (SE) to obtain consistent predictions. The proposed method is evaluated in both unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) and semi-supervised domain adaptation (SSDA). The experimental results on several real-world cross-domain benchmarks, including ImageCLEF, Office-31 and Office-Home, substantiates the superiority of the proposed method.

5.1IVDec 3, 2019
Noise2Blur: Online Noise Extraction and Denoising

Huangxing Lin, Weihong Zeng, Xinghao Ding et al.

We propose a new framework called Noise2Blur (N2B) for training robust image denoising models without pre-collected paired noisy/clean images. The training of the model requires only some (or even one) noisy images, some random unpaired clean images, and noise-free but blurred labels obtained by predefined filtering of the noisy images. The N2B model consists of two parts: a denoising network and a noise extraction network. First, the noise extraction network learns to output a noise map using the noise information from the denoising network under the guidence of the blurred labels. Then, the noise map is added to a clean image to generate a new "noisy/clean" image pair. Using the new image pair, the denoising network learns to generate clean and high-quality images from noisy observations. These two networks are trained simultaneously and mutually aid each other to learn the mappings of noise to clean/blur. Experiments on several denoising tasks show that the denoising performance of N2B is close to that of other denoising CNNs trained with pre-collected paired data.

3.4CVNov 30, 2019Code
Learning Rate Dropout

Huangxing Lin, Weihong Zeng, Xinghao Ding et al.

The performance of a deep neural network is highly dependent on its training, and finding better local optimal solutions is the goal of many optimization algorithms. However, existing optimization algorithms show a preference for descent paths that converge slowly and do not seek to avoid bad local optima. In this work, we propose Learning Rate Dropout (LRD), a simple gradient descent technique for training related to coordinate descent. LRD empirically aids the optimizer to actively explore in the parameter space by randomly setting some learning rates to zero; at each iteration, only parameters whose learning rate is not 0 are updated. As the learning rate of different parameters is dropped, the optimizer will sample a new loss descent path for the current update. The uncertainty of the descent path helps the model avoid saddle points and bad local minima. Experiments show that LRD is surprisingly effective in accelerating training while preventing overfitting.