Dengzhe Hou

Lingyu Jiang, Zirui Li, Shuo Xing et al.

The emergence of Large Reasoning Language Models (LRMs) has paved the way for tackling complex reasoning tasks through test-time scaling by generating long-form Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectories during inference. Meanwhile, these trajectories often contain explicit reflection markers such as ``wait'', ``but'', and ``alternatively'', signaling hesitation, revision, and the consideration of alternative explorations, respectively. Recent studies on test-time control leverage such markers as lightweight handles for steering reasoning, typically treating them as a single coarse-grained category rather than distinguishing their distinct functional roles. In this paper, we conduct type-wise suppression and fixed-prefix intervention, revealing that reflection markers differ not only in their functional roles but also in when they exert the greatest influence. Specifically, different marker classes affect accuracy and generation length in distinct ways, and marker choices are most consequential before the model settles into a stable reasoning trajectory. Motivated by these findings, we introduce PathCal, a novel training-free decoding controller that calibrates reasoning paths by distinguishing marker types and intervening only at locally uncertain states. At each decoding step, PathCal utilizes the distribution over reflection-markers to estimate local competition between maintaining the current reasoning trajectory and initiating a competing branch, and softly rebalances marker logits when competing-branch evidence becomes excessive. Experiments across six reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that PathCal achieves a better efficiency--performance trade-off, improving or preserving accuracy while reducing generation length, without relying on external verifiers or additional sampling.

Yuwen Zeng, Dengzhe Hou, Zhang Zhang et al.

Self-initiated attention shifts play a critical role in voluntary behavior but are difficult to study due to the absence of explicit temporal markers. While previous studies have examined their neural correlates, it remains unclear how multi-dimensional electroencephalography (EEG) features contribute to their characterization within an interpretable computational framework. In this study, we build on an experimental paradigm developed in our previous work, which enables controlled comparison between task-constrained self-initiated shifts and externally instructed shifts under identical visual stimulation. Within this setting, we investigate whether preparatory EEG activity can distinguish these two types of attention shifts. We adopt a machine learning-based approach and conduct two complementary analyses: (1) a performance-oriented assessment of frequency-specific topographic patterns, and (2) a model-based feature attribution analysis using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). These analyses provide a structured view of how spectral features across regions of interest contribute to model behavior. Our results demonstrate reliable within-subject classification performance, indicating that preparatory EEG activity contains subject-specific discriminative information within this paradigm. The analysis shows that higher-frequency bands and frontal regions contribute strongly to model decisions, although such contributions should be interpreted cautiously due to the potential influence of non-neural artifacts in high-frequency EEG signals. Overall, this work highlights the value of interpretable machine learning for analyzing subject-specific EEG signal patterns in a controlled experimental setting, with potential applications in personalized and asynchronous brain-machine interface systems.

Dengzhe Hou, Lingyu Jiang, Deng Li et al.

Task-completion rate is the standard proxy for LLM agent capability, but models with identical completion scores can differ substantially in their ability to track intermediate state. We introduce Working Memory Fidelity-Active Manipulation (WMF-AM), a calibrated no-scratchpad probe of cumulative arithmetic state tracking, and evaluate it on 20 open-weight models (0.5B-35B, 13 families) against a released deterministic 10-task agent battery. In a pre-specified, Bonferroni-corrected analysis, WMF-AM predicts agent performance with Kendall's tau = 0.612 (p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.360, 0.814]); exploratory partial-tau analyses suggest this signal persists after controlling for completion score and model scale. Three construct-isolation ablations (K = 1 control, non-arithmetic ceiling, yoked cancellation) support the interpretation that cumulative state tracking under load, rather than single-step arithmetic or entity tracking alone, is the primary difficulty source. K-calibration keeps the probe in a discriminative range where prior fixed-depth benchmarks become non-discriminative; generalization beyond this open-weight sample remains open.

Dengzhe Hou, Zihao Wu, Lingyu Jiang et al.

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a cornerstone of brain-computer interfaces and clinical neuroscience, yet deep learning models are typically trained and evaluated under a single, unreported preprocessing pipeline. We formalize preprocessing choices as a counterfactual intervention space and show that EEG predictions are surprisingly unstable under this space: across six datasets spanning four paradigms, up to 42% of trial-level predictions flip when only the preprocessing changes, a variability that standard uncertainty methods do not explicitly quantify because they condition on a fixed preprocessing pipeline. We provide three tools to make this instability measurable, decomposable, and reducible. First, a Walsh-Hadamard decomposition of the 2^7 pipeline space reveals that sensitivity is near-additive in practice under the binary intervention design, enabling efficient step-by-step optimization. Second, we introduce Preprocessing Uncertainty (PU), a per-trial diagnostic that captures a dimension of instability complementary to model-based confidence. Third, we study Normalized Adaptive PGI (NA-PGI), a graph-structured regularizer that exploits the compositional structure of preprocessing interventions as one mitigation strategy with clear scope conditions.

Zirui Li, Xinghao Chen, Lingyu Jiang et al.

Video Instance Removal (VIR) requires removing target objects while maintaining background integrity and physical consistency, such as specular reflections and illumination interactions. Despite advancements in text-guided editing, current benchmarks primarily assess visual plausibility, often overlooking the physical causalities, such as lingering shadows, triggered by object removal. We introduce the Physics-Aware Video Instance Removal (PVIR) benchmark, featuring 95 high-quality videos annotated with instance-accurate masks and removal prompts. PVIR is partitioned into Simple and Hard subsets, the latter explicitly targeting complex physical interactions. We evaluate four representative methods, PISCO-Removal, UniVideo, DiffuEraser, and CoCoCo, using a decoupled human evaluation protocol across three dimensions to isolate semantic, visual, and spatial failures: instruction following, rendering quality, and edit exclusivity. Our results show that PISCO-Removal and UniVideo achieve state-of-the-art performance, while DiffuEraser frequently introduces blurring artifacts and CoCoCo struggles significantly with instruction following. The persistent performance drop on the Hard subset highlights the ongoing challenge of recovering complex physical side effects.