Erzhuo Shao

Yifang Wang, Rui Sheng, Erzhuo Shao et al.

Large language models (LLMs) are transforming scientific workflows, not only through their generative capabilities but also through their emerging ability to use tools, reason about data, and coordinate complex analytical tasks. Yet in most human-AI collaborations, the primary outputs, figures, are still treated as static visual summaries: once rendered, they are handled by both humans and multimodal LLMs as images to be re-interpreted from pixels or captions. The emergent capabilities of LLMs open an opportunity to fundamentally rethink this paradigm. In this paper, we introduce the concept of LLM-native figures: data-driven artifacts that are simultaneously human-legible and machine-addressable. Unlike traditional plots, each artifact embeds complete provenance: the data subset, analytical operations and code, and visualization specification used to generate it. As a result, an LLM can "see through" the figure--tracing selections back to their sources, generating code to extend analyses, and orchestrating new visualizations through natural-language instructions or direct manipulation. We implement this concept through a hybrid language-visual interface that integrates LLM agents with a bidirectional mapping between figures and underlying data. Using the science of science domain as a testbed, we demonstrate that LLM-native figures can accelerate discovery, improve reproducibility, and make reasoning transparent across agents and users. More broadly, this work establishes a general framework for embedding provenance, interactivity, and explainability into the artifacts of modern research, redefining the figure not as an end product, but as an interface for discovery. For more details, please refer to the demo video available at www.llm-native-figure.com.

Yifan Qian, Zhe Wen, Alexander C. Furnas et al.

Federal research funding shapes the direction, diversity, and impact of the US scientific enterprise. Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly diffusing into scientific practice, holding substantial promise while raising widespread concerns. Despite growing attention to AI use in scientific writing and evaluation, little is known about how the rise of LLMs is reshaping the public funding landscape. Here, we examine LLM involvement at key stages of the federal funding pipeline by combining two complementary data sources: confidential National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) proposal submissions from two large US R1 universities, including funded, unfunded, and pending proposals, and the full population of publicly released NSF and NIH awards. We find that LLM use rises sharply beginning in 2023 and exhibits a bimodal distribution, indicating a clear split between minimal and substantive use. Across both private submissions and public awards, higher LLM involvement is consistently associated with lower semantic distinctiveness, positioning projects closer to recently funded work within the same agency. The consequences of this shift are agency-dependent. LLM use is positively associated with proposal success and higher subsequent publication output at NIH, whereas no comparable associations are observed at NSF. Notably, the productivity gains at NIH are concentrated in non-hit papers rather than the most highly cited work. Together, these findings provide large-scale evidence that the rise of LLMs is reshaping how scientific ideas are positioned, selected, and translated into publicly funded research, with implications for portfolio governance, research diversity, and the long-run impact of science.