Dustin Eisenhardt

Dustin Eisenhardt, Timothy Schaumlöffel, Alperen Kantarci et al.

Deep learning models for computer vision often suffer from poor generalization when deployed in real-world settings, especially when trained on synthetic data due to the well-known Sim2Real gap. Despite the growing popularity of style transfer as a data augmentation strategy for domain generalization, the literature contains unresolved contradictions regarding three key design axes: the diversity of the style pool, the role of texture complexity, and the choice of style source. We present a systematic empirical study that isolates and evaluates each of these factors for driving scene understanding, resolving inconsistencies in prior work. Our findings show that (i) expanding the style pool yields larger gains than repeated augmentation with few styles, (ii) texture complexity has no significant effect when the pool is sufficiently large, and (iii) diverse artistic styles outperform domain-aligned alternatives. Guided by these insights, we derive StyleMixDG (Style-Mixing for Domain Generalization), a lightweight, model-agnostic augmentation recipe that requires no architectural modifications or additional losses. Evaluated on the GTAV $\rightarrow$ {BDD100k, Cityscapes, Mapillary Vistas} benchmark, StyleMixDG demonstrates consistent improvements over strong baselines, confirming that the empirically identified design principles translate into practical gains. The code will be released on GitHub.

Dustin Eisenhardt, Yunhee Jeong, Florian Buettner

Multimodal learning enables neural networks to integrate information from heterogeneous sources, but active learning in this setting faces distinct challenges. These include missing modalities, differences in modality difficulty, and varying interaction structures. These are issues absent in the unimodal case. While the behavior of active learning strategies in unimodal settings is well characterized, their behavior under such multimodal conditions remains poorly understood. We introduce a new framework for benchmarking multimodal active learning that isolates these pitfalls using synthetic datasets, allowing systematic evaluation without confounding noise. Using this framework, we compare unimodal and multimodal query strategies and validate our findings on two real-world datasets. Our results show that models consistently develop imbalanced representations, relying primarily on one modality while neglecting others. Existing query methods do not mitigate this effect, and multimodal strategies do not consistently outperform unimodal ones. These findings highlight limitations of current active learning methods and underline the need for modality-aware query strategies that explicitly address these pitfalls. Code and benchmark resources will be made publicly available.