Hans Johansen

Zhe Bai, Hans Johansen

We develop a machine learning (ML) surrogate model to approximate solutions to Maxwell's equations in one dimension, focusing on scenarios involving a material interface that reflects and transmits electro-magnetic waves. Derived from high-fidelity Finite Volume (FV) simulations, our training data includes variations of the initial conditions, as well as variations in one material's speed of light, allowing for the model to learn a range of wave-material interaction behaviors. The ML model autoregressively learns both the physical and frequency embeddings in a vision transformer-based framework. By incorporating Fourier transforms in the latent space, the wave number spectra of the solutions aligns closely with the simulation data. Prediction errors exhibit an approximately linear growth over time with a sharp increase at the material interface. Test results show that the ML solution has adequate relative errors below $10\%$ in over $75$ time step rollouts, despite the presence of the discontinuity and unknown material properties.

Nishant Nangia, Hans Johansen, Neelesh A. Patankar et al.

We present a moving control volume (CV) approach to computing hydrodynamic forces and torques on complex geometries. The method requires surface and volumetric integrals over a simple and regular Cartesian box that moves with an arbitrary velocity to enclose the body at all times. The moving box is aligned with Cartesian grid faces, which makes the integral evaluation straightforward in an immersed boundary (IB) framework. Discontinuous and noisy derivatives of velocity and pressure at the fluid-structure interface are avoided and far-field (smooth) velocity and pressure information is used. We re-visit the approach to compute hydrodynamic forces and torques through force/torque balance equation in a Lagrangian frame that some of us took in a prior work (Bhalla et al., J Comp Phys, 2013). We prove the equivalence of the two approaches for IB methods, thanks to the use of Peskin's delta functions. Both approaches are able to suppress spurious force oscillations and are in excellent agreement, as expected theoretically. Test cases ranging from Stokes to high Reynolds number regimes are considered. We discuss regridding issues for the moving CV method in an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) context. The proposed moving CV method is not limited to a specific IB method and can also be used, for example, with embedded boundary methods.