Pedro Yuri Arbs Paiva

Gustavo P. Torquette, Victor S. Nunes, Pedro Y. A. Paiva et al.

Some recent pieces of work in the Machine Learning (ML) literature have demonstrated the usefulness of assessing which observations are hardest to have their label predicted accurately. By identifying such instances, one may inspect whether they have any quality issues that should be addressed. Learning strategies based on the difficulty level of the observations can also be devised. This paper presents a set of meta-features that aim at characterizing which instances of a dataset are hardest to have their label predicted accurately and why they are so, aka instance hardness measures. Both classification and regression problems are considered. Synthetic datasets with different levels of complexity are built and analyzed. A Python package containing all implementations is also provided.

Pedro Yuri Arbs Paiva, Kate Smith-Miles, Maria Gabriela Valeriano et al.

For building successful Machine Learning (ML) systems, it is imperative to have high quality data and well tuned learning models. But how can one assess the quality of a given dataset? And how can the strengths and weaknesses of a model on a dataset be revealed? Our new tool PyHard employs a methodology known as Instance Space Analysis (ISA) to produce a hardness embedding of a dataset relating the predictive performance of multiple ML models to estimated instance hardness meta-features. This space is built so that observations are distributed linearly regarding how hard they are to classify. The user can visually interact with this embedding in multiple ways and obtain useful insights about data and algorithmic performance along the individual observations of the dataset. We show in a COVID prognosis dataset how this analysis supported the identification of pockets of hard observations that challenge ML models and are therefore worth closer inspection, and the delineation of regions of strengths and weaknesses of ML models.