Chunyi Zhao

Chao Li, Yuru Wang, Chunyi Zhao

Knowledge graphs store large numbers of relations efficiently, but they remain weak at representing a quieter difficulty: the meaning of a concept often shifts with the domain in which it is used. A triple such as Apple, instance-of, Company may be acceptable in one setting while being misleading or unusable in another. In most current systems, domain information is attached as metadata, qualifiers, or graph-level organization. These mechanisms help with filtering and provenance, but they usually do not alter the formal status of the assertion itself. This paper argues that domain should be treated as part of knowledge representation rather than as supplementary annotation. It introduces the Domain-Contextualized Concept Graph (DCG), a framework in which domain is written into the relation and interpreted as a modal world constraint. In the DCG form (C, R at D, C'), the marker at D identifies the world in which the relation holds. Formally, the relation is interpreted through a domain-indexed necessity operator, so that truth, inference, and conflict checking are all scoped to the relevant world. This move has three consequences: ambiguous concepts can be disambiguated at the point of representation; invalid assertions can be challenged against their domain; cross-domain relations can be connected through explicit predicates. The paper develops this claim through a Kripke-style semantics, a compact predicate system, a Prolog implementation, and mappings to RDF, OWL, and relational databases. The contribution is a representational reinterpretation of domain itself. The central claim is that many practical failures in knowledge systems begin when domain is treated as external to the assertion. DCG addresses that by giving domain a structural and computable role inside the representation.

Chao Li, Chunyi Zhao

This paper introduces the Structural Dissolution Framework to explain how artificial intelligence restructures the coordination architecture of traditional industries. We argue that AI dissolves the boundaries that once separated firms, markets, experts, and consumers by internalizing human multimodal interfaces, including language, vision, and behavioral data, into computational systems. This process is not merely an efficiency gain but a qualitative transformation of production relations. It generates four major shifts: the erosion of firm and industry boundaries; the movement of value creation from physical resources and human collaboration to continuous token flows produced through data refinement loops; the rise of domain-specific data refinement infrastructure as the new basis of positional control; and the emergence of regional data sovereignty entities as organizational forms that replace the coordinating role of firms and markets. We define this mechanism as Interface Internalization, through which inter-agent coordination is absorbed into intra-system computation. The framework challenges the Coasian view that organizational boundaries are determined by transaction cost minimization, arguing instead that AI makes such boundaries economically obsolete. Firms may continue to exist as legal and physical entities, but their coordinating function is displaced as they become data nodes within regionally governed AI infrastructure. Using resource-dependent regional economies as an illustrative case, the paper shows how AI adoption can both transform seasonal industries into continuous economic infrastructure and replace intermediate coordination roles and traditional employment structures.